The perils of skepticism
Posted: November 30, 2009.
Print: San Francisco Chronicle
If you’ve ever used Google Alert, you know the jolts it can deliver. Whenever anyone in the blogosphere decides to blow a poison dart your way, Google is happy to deliver the news, along with the more positive mentions, of course. Most of my stinging darts come from skeptics. Over the years I’ve found that ill-tempered guardians of scientific truth can’t abide speculative thinking. And as the renowned Richard Dawkins has proved, they are also very annoyed by a nuisance named God.










Deepak Chopra seems to use the word sceptic as though being sceptical is a transgression. I think what he really means is anyone who finds his writings and views to be in need of honest and decent proof. Like most mystics he delivers platitudes and romantic rose coloured views on the awesomeness of his God. To overcome good honest scepticism all he needs to provide is a basic level of proof which takes nothing on faith and speculation as sound reasoning. Sadly, this never happens just more of the same old ‘a man without faith is nothing’. The fact that this man is responsible for producing over 50 books on health, success, relationships and spirituality, including his most recent, “Reinventing the Body, Resurrecting the Soul” is little more than a great way for him to earn a great deal of cash. His undoubted eloquence to me makes him a very smooth salesman with a silver tongued gift of the gab. Like so many charlatans that have gone before him. The fact that Mr Chopra writes for the gullible is of no surprise either as there are so many of them who are out there seeking the panacea of all ills. Or perhaps, just someone to rule their lives for them.
posted on December 2, 2009report this as inappropriate
You don't have permission to flag this entry.