Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Teenager faces prosecution for calling Scientology ‘cult’

Anil Dawar
Posted: June 1, 2009.

Print: The Guardian

A teenager is facing prosecution for using the word “cult” to describe the Church of Scientology.

The unnamed 15-year-old was served the summons by City of London police when he took part in a peaceful demonstration opposite the London headquarters of the controversial religion.

Officers confiscated a placard with the word “cult” on it from the youth, who is under 18, and a case file has been sent to the Crown Prosecution Service.

A date has not yet been set for him to appear in court.

The decision to issue the summons has angered human rights activists and support groups for the victims of cults.

The incident happened during a protest against the Church of Scientology on May 10. Demonstrators from the anti-Scientology group, Anonymous, who were outside the church’s £23m headquarters near St Paul’s cathedral, were banned by police from describing Scientology as a cult by police because it was “abusive and insulting”.

Writing on an anti-Scientology website, the teenager facing court said: “I brought a sign to the May 10th protest that said: ‘Scientology is not a religion, it is a dangerous cult.’

“‘Within five minutes of arriving I was told by a member of the police that I was not allowed to use that word, and that the final decision would be made by the inspector.”

A policewoman later read him section five of the Public Order Act and “strongly advised” him to remove the sign. The section prohibits signs which have representations or words which are threatening, abusive or insulting.

The teenager refused to back down, quoting a 1984 high court ruling from Mr Justice Latey, in which he described the Church of Scientology as a “cult” which was “corrupt, sinister and dangerous”.

After the exchange, a policewoman handed him a court summons and removed his sign.

On the website he asks for advice on how to fight the charge: “What’s the likelihood I’ll need a lawyer? If I do have to get one, it’ll have to come out of my pocket money.”

Writing on the same website, another anonymous demonstrator said: “We also protested outside another Scientology building in Tottenham Court Road which is policed by a separate force, the Metropolitan police, who have never tried to stop us using the word cult.

“We’re completely peaceful protesters expressing a perfectly valid opinion. This whole thing stinks.”

Liberty director, Shami Chakrabarti, said: “This barmy prosecution makes a mockery of Britain’s free speech traditions.

“After criminalising the use of the word ‘cult’, perhaps the next step is to ban the words ‘war’ and ‘tax’ from peaceful demonstrations?”

Ian Haworth, from the Cult Information Centre which provides advice for victims of cults and their families, said: “This is an extraordinary situation. If it wasn’t so serious it would be farcical. The police’s job is to protect and serve. Who is being served and who is being protected in this situation? I find it very worrying.

“Scientology is well known to my organisation, and has been of great concern to me for 22 years. I get many calls from families with loved ones involved and ex-members who are in need of one form of help.”

The City of London police came under fire two years ago when it emerged that more than 20 officers, ranging from constable to chief superintendent, had accepted gifts worth thousands of pounds from the Church of Scientology.

The City of London Chief Superintendent, Kevin Hurley, praised Scientology for “raising the spiritual wealth of society” during the opening
of its headquarters in 2006.

Last year a video praising Scientology emerged featuring Ken Stewart, another of the City of London’s chief superintendents, although he is not a member of the group.

The group was founded by the science-fiction writer L Ron Hubbard in 1952 and espouses the idea that humans are descended from an exiled race of aliens called Thetans.

The church continues to attract controversy over claims that it separates members from their families and indoctrinates followers.

A spokeswoman for the force said today: “City of London police had received complaints about demonstrators using the words ‘cult’ and ‘Scientology kills’ during protests against the Church of Scientology.

“Following advice from the Crown Prosecution Service some demonstrators were warned verbally and in writing that their signs breached section five of the Public Order Act.

“One demonstrator continued to display a placard despite police warnings and was reported for an offence under section five. A file on the case will go to the CPS.”

A CPS spokesman said no specific advice was given to police regarding the boy’s placard.

“In April, prior to this demonstration, as part of our normal working relationship we gave the City of London police general advice on the law around demonstrations and religiously aggravated crime in particular.

“We did not advise on this specific case prior to the summons being issued – which the police can do without reference to us – but if we receive a file we will review it in the normal way according to the code for crown prosecutors.”

Read the full article | Print this article

Comments (11)

Ah, the undeserved respect religions get.

posted on June 1, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

This story is 13 months old; it’s from May 2008. The case was dropped as far as I know.

posted on June 1, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Imagine the backlash if he called the church of london a cult!

posted on June 1, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Getting in trouble for voicing an opinion.  What has happened to freedom in Britain?

posted on June 2, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

I thought this sounded familiar. Even the Guardian link shows it’s May 2008. It looks like it’s popping up in news feeds again. The case was thrown out of court several days later:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1021431/Case-dropped-boy-15-held-sign-branding-Scientology-cult.html

posted on June 2, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

6. anders emil

Outrageous! The youngster should be hailed for thinking so independently at a young age! What a state society is in when this happens. Bring on The Reason Project!

posted on June 4, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

One can only wonder how such a situation can occur by using a word such as ‘cult’
The English Oxford dictionary states: cult • noun 1:  a system of religious worship directed towards a particular figure or object.  2 a small religious group regarded as strange or as imposing excessive control over members.  3 something popular or fashionable among a particular section of society.
This doesn’t seem in the least bit inflammatory to me. It is well known that the founder of scientology L Ron Hubbard was of spurious character like so may that attain reverent followings. I feel for all those vulnerable folk immersed in these pervasive and domineering organisations around the world.
All religions exercise oppressive control over their followers in the name of moral leadership. It still amazes me how any comment on any religion requires a delicate approach. This of course is how religions seek to control all challenges by limitation of effective argument. The policeman who instigated this assault on reasonable opinion must of course be investigated and hopefully removed for abuse of power.

posted on June 4, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

8. Michael Kingsford Gray

Perhaps the copper can’t distinguish the letter “L” from “N”??

posted on June 6, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

9. Bruce Draken

in the US we have the first amendment. Freedom of speech is valued more highly than courtesy or the freedom from being offended. A pox on laws that curb freedom of speech and protect the scurrilous!

posted on June 9, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Wow…that’s chilling. It doesn’t matter that this was not brought to trial at the discretion of the Prosecution. British law leaves a lot to be desired, starting at the very top with the outmoded and dangerous Platonic notion of a Monarchy. Some of the worst laws in the World are those that are left to the discretion of a prosecutor to either carry forward or drop.

posted on June 9, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Wow..illegal to offend people.. Why didn’t the young man then file charges against the police for offending his right to protest? I certainly find that HIGHLY offensive. Every time I think how crappy the US can be something like this turns me right around to be glad I’m here.

posted on June 29, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.