Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Secularism vs communalism: learning from the ban on full face covering veil in France

by MARIEME HELIE LUCAS
Posted: April 21, 2011.

Print: Secularism is a Women's Issue (siawi.org)

(...) The most determined and outspoken defenders of secularism today are citizens of Muslim descent, among them numerous women. It is certainly not by accident. Said Sihem Habchi, in her April 9, 2011 statement: ’Those of us who came from other countries benefited from secularism, and this is why we are so deeply attached to it’

In recent years, many individuals and groups from Muslim descent, among them numerous women, went public on three occasions:

They testified to the Stasi Commission ( that re-examined the application of secular laws in state schools which were challenged by Muslim fundamentalists ) and helped promote the 2004 law that reiterates the founding secular principles of the French republic defined in the laws of 1905 and 1906.

These century old laws institute the separation of state and church (’church’ at that time referred to the Catholic Church, and Islam was not at all in the picture). Article 1 of the 1906 law affirms the principle that the French secular state garantees to all citizens the freedom of belief - or not to believe - and the right to practice their religion - or not to practice any.

It should therefore not be a surprise that Soheib Bencheikh, speaking in 2004 to the Liberal Muslim Network, declared: ’I have to emphasize that it is thanks to secularism, that Islam (in France) can stand on equal foot with Catholicism, in rights and duties’...

Read the full article | Print this article

Comments (3)

In my humble opinion, facial identification is crucial for obvious social and security reasons. I feel very comfortable abiding by any law requiring me to “show my face in public,” in exchange for a sense of security and protection.
This issue is rather simple: just like we should all be free to have sexual intercourse in the privacy of our bedrooms—not in public—, so do all religious fanatics should have the freedom to wear whatever symbols they want, in the privacy of their homes or places of worship, not in public.

posted on April 22, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

2. alex russell

I’m against this law banning face coverings due to it infringing peoples basic freedoms to choose to live how they wish. I’m strongly against women being forced to wear clothes they don’t want to wear. Having to show your face to vote, pass a security check, and other situations where there is an actual reason to show your face could be supported, but a broad ban on a certain type of clothing flies in the face of our basic freedoms.

I find most religious beliefs untenable, but due to the fact that the government CAN use force to back up its decisions this power must be used sparingly and only to prevent evil.

posted on April 22, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Alex, this is not about a piece of clothing. It’s about fetters and manacles; that they are made out of cloth is irrelevant.

posted on April 23, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.