Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

On Knowing Your Enemy

By Sam Harris
Posted: May 7, 2012.
Published: May 7, 2012.

Print: www.samharris.org

The most dangerous failing of secularism (and of moderate religion) is that its adherents cannot seem to grasp that some people really believe martyrdom is a path to Paradise.

Read the full article | Print this article

Comments (3)

New kind of underwear in Yemen.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17985709

posted on May 7, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

My background is information security and risk management and I have been following Bruce Schneier for years. In general, he comes at this issue from a completely different perspective and level of analysis than you do. I’m looking forward to a most interesting conversation. This is going to be great. Thanks for setting this up . . .

posted on May 8, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

I’m with Schneier on getting rid of the Security Theater altogether, but he’s lacking honesty or rationality on his analysis of the screening problem.

When you’re dealing with rare event detection, you’re filtering to sort the population into a higher probability pool. Similarly, when you’re dealing with an enemy, you’re trying to increase his costs. Neither requires that your methods are foolproof.

Likely that the optimal strategy is to maintain a weighted random screening, focusing more resources on certain profiles. The optimal *will not* be failing to adjust your allocation of resources and attention according to the information you gather.

posted on May 13, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.