Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Journal told to scrap Darwin article

Robert Tait
Posted: March 14, 2009.

The Guardian

Turkey‘s feuding political factions are embroiled in a row over academic freedom after state officials forced a science journal to scrap an article celebrating the work of Charles Darwin.

Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technology) withdrew the 16-page feature from this month’s issue under orders from its publisher, the state-run Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council (Tubitak). The magazine’s editor, Cigdem Atakuman, was also sacked for “exceeding her authority” by commissioning the article, which Tubitak said was “not planned or scientifically evaluated beforehand”.

The incident has prompted accusations of censorship from academics and opposition politicians, who accuse the Islamist-rooted Justice and Development party government of trying to impose religious ideas on academic institutions. It has also led to renewed warnings from European officials that continued restrictions on freedom of speech could harm Turkey’s drive for EU membership.

The government has denied playing any role in the article’s withdrawal and has set aside its well-known opposition to evolutionary theory to join in the condemnation. Minister of state Mehmet Aydin, who is responsible for overseeing Tubitak, said the body had been guilty of censorship, - but still implicitly criticised Darwinism in his statement. “Tubitak is supposed to reflect the views of all those who have served science,” he said. “No matter how mistaken they can be.”

Read the full article | Print this article