So is it more or less of a “sin” when a priest rapes an alter boy if he uses a condom?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

See this for what it is: another attempt to tie AIDS to homosexuality. Another vile lie from Chief Paedophile Protector.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Good point David, that slipped by me. I do think that this has to be regarded as genuinely good, because millions will actually be spared misery if condoms are allowed for the ‘owned souls’. As perverse and absurd as it is, and though it pains me to say, this will probably positively impact more lives than all of Richard Dawkins contributions and efforts. And THAT is the fault of everyone for “respecting” faith.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Is it not apparent that what this man has to say is actually useless.  Yes I agree John, maybe some good will come but only because less people will be fooled by his supposed authority.  Please world, wake up.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Homosexual males can use condoms now?
What a vacuous concession from the King of the Pederasts. If a man is going to ignore Leviticus and engage in this ‘sin’, what would they care about the concerns of the pope’s attitude to the use of condoms?
I think the greater consequence of this admission is that if condoms can prevent the spread of aids in homosexuals, they can do the same for hetrosexuals.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

This is just the latest example of the church being dragged, kicking and screaming, fingernails digging into the carpet, into the modern world by a rationality-based morality.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

This is so angering.  The absolute ignorance and backwards thinking.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.