Chloroform in Print: Does the Book of Mormon get a bad rap?
Posted: May 18, 2010.
Print: Slate
excerpt:
> This text, depending on where one stands on the Mormon question, was
> either discovered by the 17-year-old Joseph Smith in upstate New York
> after the Angel Moroni directed him to golden plates written in
> reformed Egyptian, or it was the product of a budding confidence man
> who copied and pasted other pieces of scripture into a totally
> improbable tale in which ancient Israelites found their way to the New
> World. Whatever one’s views on the authenticity of the text, it has
> been widely regarded as a rather inferior work of literature,
> especially when compared to the King James Bible. “Chloroform in
> print,” is Mark Twain’s famous dismissal of it.
and (to spoil the ending) the author concludes:
> Mormonism’s success suggests that a religion can flourish in spite of
> rather than because of its founding texts.








This is great. I was raised Mormon and it’s amazing what you can believe when you’re engaged in church activities all Sunday, nearly every day all week, and have almost exclusively Mormon friends. Fortunately I’ve found my way to atheism and happiness.
posted on May 25, 2010report this as inappropriate
You don't have permission to flag this entry.