Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Can Science Explain Heaven?

By Lisa Miller
Posted: March 29, 2010.
Published: March 26, 2010.

Print: Newsweek

Excerpt:

When people die, two parts of the brain, which usually work in opposition to each other, act cooperatively. The sympathetic nervous system—a web of nerves and neurons running through the spinal cord and spread to virtually every organ in the body—is responsible for arousal and excitement. It gets you ready for action. The parasympathetic system—with which the sympathetic system is entwined—calms you down and rejuvenates you. In life, the turning on of one system prompts the shutting down of the other. The sympathetic nervous system kicks in when a car cuts you off on the highway; the parasympathetic system is in charge as you’re falling asleep. But in the brains of people reporting mystical experiences—and, perhaps, in death—both systems are fully “on,” giving a person the sensation both of slowing down, being “out of body,” and of seeing things vividly, including memories of important people and past events. Does Newberg believe, then, that visions of heaven are merely chemical-neurological events? He laughs nervously. “I don’t know.” He laughs again. “It’s, um … I don’t think we have enough evidence to say.”

Read the full article | Print this article

Comments (5)

I thought that DMT was responsible for dreams and near-death experiences.  Perhaps you described just that but using different terminology?

posted on March 31, 2010
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

no one can expalin heaven.

few in any ever arrive there from here.

most confuse paradise with heaven.

the dimenisions may be endless.

heaven is not a place but a level of awareness.

the religious and the atheist are far far away from that level of awarenss as am I.

study levels of consciousness and awareness and the evolution of consciousness to learn more.

or not which most will select or not as they   think they already know. ie human condition.

if you think consciousness is the hard problem try the awareness of self observing self.

posted on March 31, 2010
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

@researcher: Do you think, if we had the appropriate technology, that we could interpret electrical and chemical signals from the brain?  I.e. Do you believe, if we have the technology, that we could rebuild a brain or is there something intangible that we cannot recreate?

posted on April 1, 2010
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Oh Researcher, your rhetoric is so worn and dull, not to mention contradictory.

So many times we atheists have been bored by the superstitious who walk through the door, declare that something is beyond human knowledge or understanding, and then go on to tell us all they know and understand of it.

posted on April 2, 2010
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Well said RightWingAtheist.

Most religious people (who have the knowledge of existence of atheists and other religions) are IMHO in a Cognitive Bias, in that they do not value evidence over prejudice. They fail to realize that they have the concept of Heaven/Hell (and God of course) only because they were given that knowledge by their ancestors. They think other religions are not worth considering because of their perception of people following other religions (some are violent for them, some do not respect what they think about God, some are less developed socially/technologically).

posted on April 3, 2010
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.