Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Americans: Undecided About God?

By ERIC WEINER
Posted: December 11, 2011.

Print: New York Times

excerpt:

For a nation of talkers and self-confessors, we are terrible when it comes to talking about God. The discourse has been co-opted by the True Believers, on one hand, and Angry Atheists on the other. What about the rest of us?

The rest of us, it turns out, constitute the nation’s fastest-growing religious demographic. We are the Nones, the roughly 12 percent of people who say they have no religious affiliation at all. The percentage is even higher among young people; at least a quarter are Nones.

...I used to be [atheist], too, until a health scare and the onset of middle age created a crisis of faith, and I ventured to the other side. I quickly discovered that I didn’t fit there, either. I am not a True Believer. I am a rationalist. I believe the Enlightenment was a very good thing, and don’t wish to return to an age of raw superstition.

...Nones don’t get hung up on whether a religion is “true” or not, and instead subscribe to William James’s maxim that “truth is what works.” If a certain spiritual practice makes us better people — more loving, less angry — then it is necessarily good, and by extension “true.”

Read the full article | Print this article

Comments (8)

”.Nones don’t get hung up on whether a religion is “true” or not, and instead subscribe to William James’s maxim that “truth is what works.””

How pathetic.  Why can’t people just be happy with the truth?  It’s a cowardly and lazy way out.

posted on December 11, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Patrick, I agree with you.  What’s more, I think the only thing that CAN “work” in the long run is truth, since eventually, sooner or later, anything else is going to collide with reality.  And when you collide with reality, you’re the one who gets broken.

posted on December 12, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

“I imagine a religious space that celebrates doubt, encourages experimentation and allows one to utter the word God without embarrassment.”

Isn’t that called Unitarian Universalism?

posted on December 12, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Agreed Patrick, Bertrand Russel also said it wisely: one should believe it if it’s true, not because it is convenient, and if you can’t say it if is true or not, you should suspend judgement.

posted on December 13, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

I’m not sure why this is in the Hall of Shame.  It’s not that bad of a position.  If anything, it’s just an atheist who’s afraid to call himself an atheist.

posted on December 13, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

The only truth humans know about god is that we cannot know the truth about god.

posted on December 15, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

7. Noek vanBiljon

I have fairies at the bottom of my garden. They sit on flowers with their exquisite little legs crossed waiving their little sparkling wands. I have been talking to them for eighty years but they never talk to me. They look at me intensely and from time to time they look at each other without saying a word only their wands sometimes sparkle more brightly. With listeners like that , who needs a god?

posted on December 24, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

He’s wanting a ‘domain’ where experimentation and doubt are comfortable and necessary things?
Philosophy, perhaps, is what he’s looking for.

posted on December 29, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.