Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Why Newt Gingrich Converted to Catholicism

Amy Sullivan
Posted: August 14, 2009.
Published: Aug. 24, 2009.

Print: Time

Visitors to the Basilica of the National Shrine in northeast Washington often do a double take when they see Newt Gingrich and his familiar shock of white hair slip into a pew for the noon Mass on Sundays. The former Speaker of the House is known for many things, but religious zeal is not one of them. In fact, the social conservatives who fueled his Republican revolution in 1994 often complained about Gingrich’s lack of interest in issues like abortion or school prayer.

This past spring, however, after several decades as a nominal Southern Baptist, Gingrich converted to Catholicism. With the fervor of a convert, he has embraced the role of defending both his new faith and religious liberty. In his 2006 book Rediscovering God in America, Gingrich lambasted what he calls the “secular effort to reject any sense of a spiritual life as mattering.” And days before he officially joined the Catholic Communion on March 29, he was among the first to criticize the University of Notre Dame for inviting Barack Obama to speak, Twittering (of course): “It is sad to see notre dame invite president obama to give the commencement address since his policies are so anti catholic.”

Read the full article | Print this article

Comments (23)

This would be easier to take if it weren’t from NG’s long history of hypocrisy and moral double-talk.

posted on August 18, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

2. Robert Elessar

Actually, I think a long history of hypocrisy and moral double-talk is quite appropriate for someone converting to Catholicism.

posted on August 18, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Newt is a Catholic now? But what if he has another affair while his wife is sick and he wants to divorce her?

posted on August 18, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

That would be an ecumenical matter

posted on August 19, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

After reading so much Reason Project, Why Evolution Is True, Pharnygula and all the rest, doesn’t it strike you guys as pretty funny that people still ‘convert’ from one religion to another? Convert from what? Its like renaming your imaginary friend Ted instead of Sam.

posted on August 19, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Yes, it’s really funny… he probably also thinks it rains because God’s crying.

posted on August 22, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

7. Steve Leone

To Rbt Elessar, anti-Catholics and so-called atheists.  Please submit a ceditable explanation for the events that occurred in Fatima, Portugal on Oct. 13, 1917 in which three peasant children led a crowd of thousands, to witness a spectacular occurrence at the exact hour of day that was predicted earlier in that year so that all would believe.  Thank you.

posted on August 22, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Steve Leone “To Rbt Elessar, anti-Catholics and so-called atheists.  Please submit a ceditable explanation for the events that occurred in Fatima, Portugal on Oct. 13, 1917 in which three peasant children led a crowd of thousands, to witness a spectacular occurrence at the exact hour of day that was predicted earlier in that year so that all would believe.  Thank you.”

The way this question is phrased implies that you need to be proven wrong, when the reverse is true. When making a point the burden of proof lies with you.

posted on August 22, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

9. Chris Todd

I guess Newt figured it worked for Constantine, he might as well give it a try too!  The guy is so morally bankrupt and hypocritical….this is why I joined the Reason Project and tell my friends about it.

posted on August 23, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

10. Steve Leone

To Tat 10000
  You need to acquaint yourself with the facts of the Fatima events.  One doesn’t need to prove that WW1 occurred.  These are well documented. historical facts.

posted on August 24, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

To Steve Leone

I just spent a few minutes at fatima.org

Perhaps you could now spend a few minutes reading David Hume

posted on August 24, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

12. Steve Leone

To loon8
No events were presented in Fatima.org. Please google Fatima Miracle for the complete story. It will take more than just a few minutes. I will look into your David Hume(?) reference.

posted on August 24, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

13. Steve Leone

To loon8
Perhaps you can relate what David Hume, 1711-76, a Scottish historian,economist and philosopher would have to say about an event to occur some 140 years after he died.  He seems to have been a very much admired thinker.

posted on August 24, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

To Steve Leone,

I did read Fatima and I know WW1 occurred. But they are not one in the same. Your logic is false. Just because the war happened doesn’t mean the what happened in Portugal was a miracle. That’s quite a leap of logic.
Maybe there was some sort of weather phenomenon or something else that can be logically explained. I can’t say as there is not enough factual information for me to judge one way or the other.
What I can say from what I read is that you can’t say for sure either, that is why I asked to prove your point instead of trying to get others to prove you wrong.

posted on August 24, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

15. Steve Leone

To Tat10000
I was saying that documented historical events need no proof.  Wether wars or floods etc.  You are saying some sort of weather phenomenon or whatever can logically be explained.  I am happy that you agree that a phenomenom did occur, now my question is how did 3 peasant children know when this phenomenon was going to happen?  That in and of itself maybe the “miracle”.  Afterall these 3 little astronomers had no computers.

posted on August 25, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

To Steve Leone
It isn’t a documented historical event. There isn’t any proof or reliable testimony that I can find.  The old “prove me wrong” logical fallacy seems to be one of the favorites among religious persons.
So here’s how someone versed in reason would approach the situation. If you think the Virgin Mary came down from the sky in a dancing sun that day, then prove it. You prove that it was a miracle. It’s not our burden to prove that it wasn’t, that’s preposterous. Prove that what happened that day actually happened, and that it was a religious miracle. I don’t have to prove anything. So I repeat what everyone else has said, yet you’ve failed to understand: the burden of proof is on you, sir.

posted on August 25, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

17. Steve Leone

To cmortell
              Reporters from the Lisbon newspapers witnessed and reported the phenomenon of that day.  In my mind their reports make this a documented historical account.unless of course nothing happened that day and they wanted to promote sales of their paper.  These accounts were also written up in newspapers all over the world.  In order to proceed further, it must be agreed that an unnatural physical event occurred that day in Fatima from all reports of witnesses and objective, if not an-anti-clerical reporters, among others,  such as Doctors,  Agnostics,  Atheists,  etc. The crowd of many thousands surely was composed of all types of people.  Now if this does not settle the question with you that a large crowd gathered and a phenomenal event occurred for them,  we really cannot go any further in this matter.                What do you believe happened that day for the large crowd of people gathered there on that field?

posted on August 25, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

18. Steve Leone

To cmortell
        You have assumed the following:
1) that I am a religious person
2) that I believe the Virgin Mary came down with the dancing sun.
  3) that I called it a religious miracle

      I will assume the following:
  1) that you have not read the testimony and full accounts of this event
  2) that you will not render a creditable response to my question.
  3) that you even want proof that a crowd of thousands were present on that day.

posted on August 26, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Catholics and government have been bed fellows for thousands of years. It’s a good credential if you want a career in politics. The catholic church is the poster child of all republicans.

posted on September 2, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

20. Steve Leone

Wow I have not heard that one before.  Maybe it’s because it took 200 years for a Catholic to be elected President.

posted on September 2, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

So you all know, this Steve Leone character is a troll that uses the same asinine bait (the Fatima thing) in every forum he can get on. He’s equally adept at sock puppetry and I suspect he’s got a advanced degree in douchebaggery.

Ignore him for a while, then ignore his sock puppet and then he’ll move on to annoy other people elsewhere.

posted on September 17, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

22. Steve Leone

Bob
    You are like Adam falsely accusing me of being a Troll.  Maybe you are a Sock Puppet for Adam.  This blog conducted by Brian has not had this issue and all has gone on with some reasonable people with no censorship etc. You are mudding the waters from a blog that has been closed and I am attempting to have it removed.  This entire problem comes from IP #s which are known to be spoofed very easily.  I am trying to show that I am not the Troll and until you can show otherwise please refrain from libeling and defaming my good name which Adam has done. 
After 2 weeks you have not commented on my last comment but are trying to introduce a closed blog elsewhere to continue here.  I have no idea what a sock puppet is let alone how to disprove it. Do You??

posted on September 18, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

23. Steve Leone

Correction   the name Brian should be changed to Amy in the above comment 22.

posted on September 18, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.