Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

The misuses of Darwin

Simon Underdown
Posted: November 12, 2009.
Published: November 12, 2009.

Print: The Guardian

For evolutionary scientists there is no such thing as “Darwinism”. Instead we have a scientific theory that, in combination with Mendel’s work, provides the modern or neo-Darwinian synthesis, which explains the development of life on Earth. Although this is a rather succinct definition it effectively sets the limits of the usefulness of Darwin’s theory. However, in the last 150 years, there have been many attempts to take Darwin’s idea and apply it outside of the context for which it was developed, hence the influence of social “Darwinism” on concepts such as eugenics and a more recent Darwinian nihilism that absolves the individual of any moral or social responsibility.

Read the full article | Print this article

Comments (3)

Well other than the last two paragraphs, I thought this was a decent article.

posted on November 17, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

2. Kenneth Dolan

I must concur with Dan J. I’m yet to be convinced that islam is peaceful, and “blaming Darwin” for anything in our nature is like blaming a war on the journalist reporting from it.

posted on November 19, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

I thought the same thing.  Last two paragraphs are P.R. bullocks, but the rest of the article is decent though a bit lacking in reasons to defend his point, I thought.

Darwin explains a natural process, and has yet to explain our cognitive mind.  Islam is a product of that cognitive mind, one that has proven to be, by it’s own merits, severely dangerous.

posted on November 19, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.