Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason
Volunteer to help Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Violent Criminal Spared From Prison Because He Was Religious

By Matthew Moore
Posted: February 3, 2010.
Published: February 4, 2010.

Print: Telegraph

The former prime minister’s wife, who sits as a judge as Cherie Booth QC, told Shamso Miah that she would suspend his prison sentence because he was a “religious man”.

Miah, a devout Muslim, had been convicted of breaking a man’s jaw with two punches after a dispute in a bank queue in East Ham, London. The 25-year-old had gone to the bank from a local mosque.

Miss Booth, who has made no secret of her strong Roman Catholic faith, appeared to indicate that she was taking into account Miah’s religious beliefs as she opted for a lenient sentence.

“I am going to suspend this sentence for the period of two years based on the fact you are a religious person and have not been in trouble before,” she told him at Inner London Crown Court.

“You caused a mild fracture to the jaw of a member of the public standing in a queue at Lloyds Bank. You are a religious man and you know this is not acceptable behaviour.”

The National Secular Society has lodged an official protest with the Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC), claiming that Miss Booth was effectively discriminating against atheists.

Terry Sanderson, president of the NSS, told The Daily Telegraph’s Mandrake column: “This seems to indicate that she would not have treated a non-religious person with the same latitude. We think this is discriminatory and unjust.”

The OJC was established in 2006 to handle complaints against members of the judiciary. If the protest is deemed worthy of investigation the OJC can demand that Miss Booth gives a written account of her decision.

It is also able to appoint senior judge to carry out a full inquiry, which could result in formal disciplinary action.

Read the full article | Print this article

Comments (4)

Great article… “I am going to suspend this sentence for the period of two years based on the fact you are a religious person and have not been in trouble before,” yeah, and I will do the same for all criminals who have committed crimes in the name of religion.

posted on February 4, 2010
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Re: Katie - No no. It’s not ‘in the name of God,’ it’s ‘because of the belief in God.’ The religion gets away with it otherwise. Horseman Hitchens pointed this out.

posted on February 5, 2010
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

3. MajorityofOne

This is backwards. Since I don’t believe in god and therefore don’t know any better—THAT should get me out of prison. If I know better, I should get thrown in with the gen-pop for much longer, no?

posted on February 6, 2010
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Jason01- thanks for the clarification… somehow it still doesnt make sense.

posted on February 8, 2010
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.