So, what you are saying is that when I respond to three pages of personal characterizations about who and what I am, I am being narcissistic in doing so.
So, what you are saying is that religious people, especially Christians, are narcissistic because they claim that they have experienced a living God “personally”, rather than only in a group…I guess like the sun shines on a group of walruses.
So, what you are saying is that I am vainglorious, have only opinion, have no depth, have no substance, have no support, am a hypocrite, am irrelevant, am begging for respect, am a wannabe, am an accumulation of froth and foam, am self-important, have psychological issues, am very insecure about life, and am very insecure about reality—and, saying all this in a few sentences.
So, what you are saying is that you have this picture of me because God absolutely does not exist and anyone who claims a certitude to the contrary must be all these things above.
So, what you are saying is that if I ended all my posts, which are “the epitome of incredible PERSONAL OPINION”, about the experience of God, the knowledge of God, and the understanding of God with IMO, I would be acceptable to people like you with a certitude of intellect, not PERSONAL OPINION, that God does not exist, so therefore there is no experience, knowledge, or understanding to be had.
So, what you are saying is that you are none of these characterizations above and I am all of them, because God does not exist, and you brilliant thinkers know it.
Okay. I understand what you are saying.