On Universally Equal Rights

Freestyle

By Daniel Moore

  In respects to the correlation of equality and universal rights one should seek patterns that prohibit constant consequences. African Americans are now freed from slavery but what about the dog? Why must he stay in his cage? Why must he only eat “dog” food every day when an owner would not like to eat grilled cheese sandwiches every day for the rest of his or her life? I know that the answer to this question is that the standard of living of life on this planet is low, but why must we not see the inequality? The dog, the cat, and all other life is equal to us in that it has emotions. The dog should be fed three meals a day, but rather a healthy diet, to logically out compete with the argument that too much food will cause the dog to be overweight. I have seen dogs salivate for fruit and I have a dog that loves green tea. We must understand that taste is but a sense and as all life has emotions all life does have senses, taste being one of those senses. To not understand that life is equal and each deserves the highest treatment is to diminish the potential bliss for all other life. And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life. I often envision a future where the animals go to schools to learn basic knowledge that there brains can comprehend through advanced methods of communication. But I also envision paradoxes. I envision the hypothetical, but absolutely certain scenarios where medicine advances to the capability of immortality for all of life. But I wonder if the absolute standard of living for all life is a realistic vision in that resources are limited. Even in an abundant universe if we are to include all life in the universe. We probably must learn to create water….  My dog today drank some of my pure organic blueberry juice and he loved it and because he loved it he at that moment loved life. However going back to the given paradox in which we give the medicine of immortality to all life then we must become all vegans. Same with the bear, same with the lions and fat men…they all must learn to eat vegan because the basis of universal equality is that all life deserves the highest standard a living, which includes life. And under this model to kill any animal or any form of life would be a crime. In conclusion we should conclude that we are one. We are one and we will not settle for the system that provides us whether it be dog food or cages. And this my friends a major part of a utopia, it is heaven, so we should increase NASA funding because we need more room. Perhaps these animals will not be allowed to have kids. But that would be against there free will . So that is something Congress will soon vote on. Or I’ll logically handle it.  ........I know it’s sloppy but its a freestyle. I’ll fix it later.

Moore’s Art Volume: 1
By: Daniel Moore

Part A: On Natural Philosophy

Ch. 1 On Disproving God
Ch. 2 Logic on Creation Pt. 1
Ch. 3 Logic on Creation Pt. 2
Ch. 4 Moore’s Problem
Ch. 5 All Possible Settings Before and After Creation
Ch. 6 On Where Laws Come From
Ch. 7 On Epistemology
Ch. 8 On the Ideology of Science
Ch. 9 On Life Pt. 1
Ch. 10 On Life Pt. 2
Ch. 11 On Religious Characteristics applied to the Future
Ch. 12 On Science and Philosophy
Ch. 13 On Rationalism and Empiricism

Part B: The Nation of Earth (How to End World Hunger, Transition to all Clean Transportation, Transition to all Clean Energy, and How to Save the Rain forests)

Ch. 14 On Developmental Economics Pt. 1
Ch. 15 Introducing the Utopia Pt. 1
Ch. 16 On Developmental Economics Pt. 2
Ch. 17 Introducing the Utopia Pt. 2
Ch. 18 Creating the Utopia
Ch. 19 The Driving Forces Behind the Utopia
Ch. 20 The Outlined Governing Body of Earth
Ch. 21 On Rules, Methods, and Regulations
Ch. 22 On the Profit of the Utopia
Ch. 23 On Monarchs Applied to the Utopia
Ch. 24 The Free Market of the Utopia

Part C: On Political Philosophy

Ch. 25 On Enlightenment Vs. Darkness
Ch. 26 On How Democracy was taken Advantage of
Ch. 27 On Pacifism Vs. War
Ch. 28 Criticism of Current Governments
Ch. 29 Taxation vs. Consumer Saving vs. State Savings
Ch. 30 Criticism on Religious States
Ch. 31 Criticism on Monarchs

Part D: On Miscellaneous Philosophy

Ch. 32 Questioning on Behavior in a Experimental Structure
Ch. 33 On Psychological Metanoia
Ch. 34 Potions for a Positive Mind-State
Ch. 35 On Manifestation and Cycles of Stress
Ch. 36 Figurative Language on Nutrition and Mind-State
Ch. 37 On Dreaming Pt. 1
Ch. 38 On Dreaming Pt. 2
Ch. 39 On Definition
Ch. 40 Scientific Experiments on Spiritual Laws Pt. 1
Ch. 41 On Karma
Ch. 42 On Universally Equal Rights

DanielMoore1991 - 19 January 2012 08:17 PM

And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life.

Not only is there no basis for that it also runs counter to nature.

GAD - 20 January 2012 09:39 AM

DanielMoore1991 - 19 January 2012 08:17 PM

And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life.

Not only is there no basis for that it also runs counter to nature.

No basis ? The basis is the knowledge we’ve produced. I agree that there is a possibility some creatures have more potential but we are definitely more advanced.

DanielMoore1991 - 20 January 2012 10:01 AM

GAD - 20 January 2012 09:39 AM

DanielMoore1991 - 19 January 2012 08:17 PM

And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life.

Not only is there no basis for that it also runs counter to nature.

No basis ? The basis is the knowledge we’ve produced. I agree that there is a possibility some creatures have more potential but we are definitely more advanced.

Again no basis that knowledge leads to an objective truth of rights or that dogs deserve pure organic blueberry juice.

GAD - 20 January 2012 10:20 AM

DanielMoore1991 - 20 January 2012 10:01 AM

GAD - 20 January 2012 09:39 AM

DanielMoore1991 - 19 January 2012 08:17 PM

And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life.

Not only is there no basis for that it also runs counter to nature.

No basis ? The basis is the knowledge we’ve produced. I agree that there is a possibility some creatures have more potential but we are definitely more advanced.

Again no basis that knowledge leads to an objective truth of rights or that dogs deserve pure organic blueberry juice.

Agree, Gad, a lot of words in the OP with little coherent meaning.

GAD - 20 January 2012 10:20 AM

DanielMoore1991 - 20 January 2012 10:01 AM

GAD - 20 January 2012 09:39 AM

DanielMoore1991 - 19 January 2012 08:17 PM

And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life.

Not only is there no basis for that it also runs counter to nature.

No basis ? The basis is the knowledge we’ve produced. I agree that there is a possibility some creatures have more potential but we are definitely more advanced.

Again no basis that knowledge leads to an objective truth of rights or that dogs deserve pure organic blueberry juice.

    I didn’t say knowledge leads to rights. I was just speculating on the model of universally equal rights. And one of the points is who cares if the dogs deserves the organic blueberry juice or not I want to give it to him and provide for him. I know my dog desires it. I know animals desire diversity in food because of there senses.  I was just offering sight into the spectrum of rights of creatures and how far it can extend.

Dennis Campbell - 20 January 2012 10:38 AM

GAD - 20 January 2012 10:20 AM

DanielMoore1991 - 20 January 2012 10:01 AM

GAD - 20 January 2012 09:39 AM

DanielMoore1991 - 19 January 2012 08:17 PM

And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life.

Not only is there no basis for that it also runs counter to nature.

No basis ? The basis is the knowledge we’ve produced. I agree that there is a possibility some creatures have more potential but we are definitely more advanced.

Again no basis that knowledge leads to an objective truth of rights or that dogs deserve pure organic blueberry juice.

Agree, Gad, a lot of words in the OP with little coherent meaning.

It was written off the top of my head and it is not like there needs to be anymore justification than loving and acknowledging others desires.. & It was just mere speculation of an absolute model.

I’m guessing you have one of those froofy little dogs that fits in a purse. My dog would rather eat your dog than blueberry juice.

Antisocialdarwinist - 20 January 2012 12:24 PM

I’m guessing you have one of those froofy little dogs that fits in a purse. My dog would rather eat your dog than blueberry juice.

Nah, he’d get indigestion

Antisocialdarwinist - 20 January 2012 12:24 PM

I’m guessing you have one of those froofy little dogs that fits in a purse. My dog would rather eat your dog than blueberry juice.

Haha no, I don’t. But that is just like how some humans would rather eat meat than drink blueberry juice.

‘And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life.’

Of course this has merit. If we can destroy other life on this planet, we should always look at how and why it should also be preserved. This is why we have things like the endangered species act. Other species matter. It just so happens that there may sometimes be better options than mere survival of the fittest. We have already for a long time now changed and modified natural selection. Just because it is a natural process, does not always mean it is the only or best process.

Avogadro’s number - 20 January 2012 01:32 PM

‘And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life.’

Of course this has merit. If we can destroy other life on this planet, we should always look at how and why it should also be preserved. This is why we have things like the endangered species act. Other species matter. It just so happens that there may sometimes be better options than mere survival of the fittest. We have already for a long time now changed and modified natural selection. Just because it is a natural process, does not always mean it is the only or best process.

I agree. Look I want to provide for life so it can become independent. I want to stop destroying the Earth so other animals and creatures can have the resources to be independent. But because we have destroyed the ecosystem so much and set ourselves so far back from a utopia for the animals and other creatures that we have to initially provide so they can become independent. The animal kingdom is not going to evolve at a rate we want unless we give them freedom and raise there standard of living.

Avogadro’s number - 20 January 2012 01:32 PM

‘And because we are the most intelligent life on this planet it is our duty that we should provide for other life.’

Of course this has merit. If we can destroy other life on this planet, we should always look at how and why it should also be preserved.

I agree, we have a responsibility based on the meanings and values of life for which we have come to recognize and assign based on our knowledge and awareness of the universe.

What the fuck? Ego trip much?

JayD - 21 January 2012 11:13 AM

What the fuck? Ego trip much?

Who? The animals? No, the point is it is a right ... in the future.

The ego trip I’m referring to is your 42 chapters. What are you trying to do, steal my loyal cult followers? How will they ever be able to contain your ego as well as mine in such a modest-sized forum as this?