Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

 
   
1 of 3
1
OK so I’m an atheist, now what?  Has anyone considered a local civic society for the promotion of science?
Posted: 11 June 2011 07:03 PM   [ Ignore ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  1
Joined  2011-06-11

I joined this forum to ask one question that I haven’t seen yet, but let me know if this should be under another thread…

When I was a kid I went to church in a California mission.  The mass was unbearably boring, but I have very vivid and fond memories of certain rituals, particularly that everyone would wish “peace be with you” to total strangers on a weekly basis.  After church everyone would gather in the foyer to eat donuts and talk with their neighbors.

For whatever reason I have never able to make myself believe religious myths, though I’ve certainly tried.  Finally I resolved to appreciate science and its beauty, but now that I’m an adult I miss that group exclusivity and connection with a “private club” of kind-hearted and like minded people.  I’ve moved to several cities in the US and abroad now and always felt a certain jealousy of the religious people I met who were instantly plugged into a close community.

In a Real Time with Bill Maher show some time ago, when Bill told a guest (Patton Oswalt maybe?) that he should be an atheist, the guest said “Why? What have you got over there?”  I couldn’t agree more, and I feel like we are not offering those who are in religious communities with an attractive alternative community, one that could actually have a voice in American politics.  I live in San Francisco and and the groups available seem to be interested only in talking about why one SHOULDN’T believe myths.  I feel that I’m well beyond that - where are the groups for those of us who don’t believe, are done analyzing their faith, who don’t have any interest in pursuing the nature of belief or the truth of deism anymore, and yet enjoy the beauty of ritual and the warmth of a local community of similar-thinking people?

So my question is: would Project Reason or its members be interested in creating a club or civic society that is based on humanist values and the promotion of science, instead of a religious organization?  The Freemasons seem to have done an incredible job of promoting rational values through the use of symbols and studies, and are certainly cliquish enough, but require belief in a god to join.

Looking forward to your replies!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 June 2011 06:43 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5594
Joined  2004-12-24

Why do you think religious communities are exclusive to theists?

 Signature 

“Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment.  Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”—Albert Einstein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 June 2011 09:01 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4277
Joined  2008-05-23

Hi, Avokat. Thanks for your post.

‘Group exclusivity’? ‘Private club’? You find these desirable? If so, you would be better off in a church or a mosque. It sounds like you enjoy the old ‘them and us’ dichotomy.

Exclusivity seems to me to be the way not to spread reason. As far as I can see atheists are not generally like that. ‘Inclusivity’ or at least tolerance, are more to their liking. Knowledge and rationality do not do well when closed off to others. They must be offered to all if we are to make progress. Elitism is anathema. Atheism gives us no special rights. But maybe I am reading you wrong.

There are non-theist organisations who meet regularly all over the world (you mentioned SF). If they are not providing what you need in the way of exclusivity and clubiness, then I’m not sure what to snuggest except going back to church. It seems to me that exclusivity and clubiness always come with ritual and woo that goes beyond rationality. As far as I can see, non-theists value rationality far too much to allow for the woo that goes with exclusivity.

I think it would be valuable if we could organise ourselves better in terms of providing charity and education. But that will take time. The church has had 2000 years to organise. And their cute little ‘Peace be with you’ is very recent. I know. I was there long before the reforms (such as they were). Nothing of substance changed.

How about organising a group of atheist medics to volunteer for Medecins Sans Frontiers or some other non-theist organisation. That is how we’ll carry our message out to the world at large. It will not happen within exclusive clubs.
Again, sorry if I have misinterpreted your post.

[ Edited: 12 June 2011 09:05 AM by Die fröhliche Wissenschaft (Rob) ]
 Signature 

Faith means not wanting to know what is true Nietzsche

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 June 2011 10:30 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1883
Joined  2006-02-20

Avokat,

Have you considered SkepticX’s question?  And I’d second DfW’s suggestions.  I know non-theist people who have joined a Unitarian group for the reasons you brought up.

There must be ‘communities’ of scientists you could join, where most of the members would be atheists and skeptics.  Generally speaking, societies like that, and their meeting places, wouldn’t be targeted by hate groups.

It seems strange to think of Christians as belonging to a hate group, but if you listen to some TV evangelists you will hear them preaching a kind of hatred toward those who don’t accept their myths and legends - particularly if you don’t accept the legend of Jesus as historical fact.  Some of their listeners might feel that they were doing their god or savior a favor if they threw a rock or Molotov cocktail through the window of the local Atheist Society.  Some Planned Parenthood offices have been targeted like this, and in many U.S. communities I would guess that atheist meeting places would be targets of Christian bigotry, hatred, and superstition - (behavior related to witch hunting and the persecution of heretics).

With scientists and humanists you’d have like-minded people to socialize with, without making yourself an obvious target for hate groups.  I see in the news today that Southern Baptist membership is falling off.  Maybe the day isn’t far off when we can have Atheist Pride marches without fear of violence?

[ Edited: 12 June 2011 10:49 AM by unsmoked ]
 Signature 

“All is all there is, you surely wouldn’t ask for more.”  -  Bill Thomas

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 June 2011 11:01 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7911
Joined  2008-02-15

I can appreciate the idea but have no time for such clubs, too busy fighting the war against religion. When religion falls then everyone will be in my club and then there be time for robes and funny hats.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
The Way of the Mister, Vol. 1: Reparative Therapy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 June 2011 11:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4277
Joined  2008-05-23

Yeah, guns before butter.

 Signature 

Faith means not wanting to know what is true Nietzsche

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 June 2011 11:23 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7911
Joined  2008-02-15
Die fröhliche Wissenschaft - 12 June 2011 11:05 AM

Yeah, guns before butter.

More like; butter ==> guns ==> butter war ==> butter ==> rinse & repeat.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
The Way of the Mister, Vol. 1: Reparative Therapy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 June 2011 11:27 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4277
Joined  2008-05-23

LOL. Yes, we humans do seem to almost insist on repeating our mistakes.

 Signature 

Faith means not wanting to know what is true Nietzsche

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 June 2011 11:37 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7911
Joined  2008-02-15
Die fröhliche Wissenschaft - 12 June 2011 11:27 AM

LOL. Yes, we humans do seem to almost insist on repeating our mistakes.


Butter is power. That drives desire, greed, entitlement and gods will.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
The Way of the Mister, Vol. 1: Reparative Therapy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 June 2011 11:54 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4277
Joined  2008-05-23

Yes, I’m much more into butter than guns. And at a pinch you can use it as a lubricant. Try doing that with you Kalishnakof (or howerver it’s spelt).

 Signature 

Faith means not wanting to know what is true Nietzsche

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 August 2011 05:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  1
Joined  2011-08-15

While I understand some push-back here, given the likely almost universal dislike for anything church-like among the membership, I think Avokat has a valid point.

I call myself a “recovering Catholic”, but I too have fond boyhood memories of playing with friends and narfing donuts after church on Sundays; that, and the church social functions, the general good feelings you get (and associate with church as a result of) helping those in need, etc.  As Rob mentioned, the church has had a couple millennia to build all this up, in various incarnations, and they are very, very good at it.  Unfortunately, though, that can be a powerful draw.

Move to a new city as an xtian, and as soon as you find a church you have the beginnings of a social circle, complete with regularly-scheduled activities, and a ready-made group of people who share a fairly significant subset of your beliefs.  Likewise for muslim->mosque, jew->temple, etc.  Now try the same exercise as an atheist, a prospect I and my family face in the foreseeable future.  Where do we go for something like that?  I have a young (elementary school age) daughter.  I’m not taking her to a meeting of philosophers and scientists, and it wouldn’t fit the same role anyway.  Yes, if they have a science fair or other such activities, we’ll jump all over it.  But even if that sort of thing is a regular event (and holding such events with high frequency is rare in the extreme), it’s still not the same.

I’m not looking for a secret society or a cult; VERY much the opposite.  But dammit, where do I go?  Where can an atheist bring his or her family?  Yes, there are community activities, and street festivals, and science museums in most major metro areas.  That’s great.  But there’s no atheist community.  I can’t go to my local “atheist center” for the regular Sunday afternoon meet-n-greet, or join my fellow atheists down at the food bank for the every-Saturday help session.  There’s no Rationalist Sunday School to send my little one to, while I go into the main auditorium to enjoy listening to a speaker on Morality as Developed from the Evolutionary Perspective, or participate in a group debate on Objectivism vs Secular Humanism, or any number of other topics that would be suitable, engaging, and thoroughly enjoyable for such a gathering.  Yes, there are non-church-affiliated social clubs and groups and whatnot, but they’re not specifically geared toward people who are non-church-affiliated, if you see what I mean.  Such clubs will likely just have a statistically similar distribution of faiths (and lack thereof) as society at large.  Again, that doesn’t fit the bill.

The “now what” question is a good one, and not something you should brush aside lightly.  There’s a reason there are so many social clubs, societies, and the like.  People are gregarious by nature.  We gather for a myriad of reasons, but the point is we gather.  When you try to pull people away from religion, they are going to need something to replace the social network and support their church represents.

Think about it.  In a church setting, they have tens, hundreds, or even thousands of people who are constantly telling them that their beliefs are correct.  That is happening both explicitly and implicitly.  Their immediate friends and clergy directly reinforce it, their acquaintances reinforce it by their actions and whenever they’re overheard in a conversation, etc, etc.  They are immersed in a culture which constantly, subtly tells them that this set of internally-conflicting, immoral, irrational beliefs that they espouse is right.

Now what about us?  Where is that reinforcement?  Where is the subtle, everyday feedback as we go through life?  Where can I go, with no real prior introduction, and know that I can express my views, opinions, and philosophy, without having to worry about ending up with a bible being waved in my face as if it were a valid (not to mention irrefutable) logical rebuttal?  Or worse, that my little girl would have to hear her father being called any number of unkind and/or obscene names for daring to speak such “blasphemies”.

It’s already challenging enough to be in the minority where religion is concerned.  Why make it more challenging and less appealing by not having such an organization/fellowship?  There is value there.  Children can grow up seeing that mommy and daddy aren’t the only adults who believe this way and that there are other kids who are being taught the same things.  Adults can have a place to go and people to gather with who share the rationalist mindset.  It might even reduce the “fringe” perception that so many of the religious hold of atheists.

Thank you, Avokat, for posting this.  I just discovered project-reason.org, and as soon as I saw there was a forum dedicated to potential future projects, this was exactly the one that came to mind.  It’s something I’ve been thinking about with some regularity for quite a while, but more so since I became a parent.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 August 2011 11:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4277
Joined  2008-05-23

Yeah. I wish there was something parents could take youngsters to regularly. I don’t have kids but I’d go along just to pump up the numbers and put something in the collection plate.

There are humanist and secular groups that meet in various cities around the world but I agree that these groups don’t have the same family ‘pull’ as religion and it’s churches.

Perhaps something structured around a charity - the local humanist soup kitchen, for example , or a service such as child centres and summer camps… I dunno. Any ideas anyone? Or are humanists/secularists/atheists just hopelessly individualist, anti-social and essentially unherdable? If so, it’s always going to be an uphill battle trying to compete with the supernaturalists for hearts and minds.

 Signature 

Faith means not wanting to know what is true Nietzsche

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2011 04:54 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5594
Joined  2004-12-24

The word is community.

There are quite a few atheist communities out there, but you usually have to go to a large population center to find most of them, and many are either spread widely and rather thin, or are just online. But as my initial post in here pointed out, there are good religious communities that accommodate atheists, some have no problem with it at all. The Unitarians have absolutely no problem with atheism, and a sizable chunk of the local UU church are atheists, you just have to be able to handle the touchy-feely, pie-in-the-sky, peace, love and joy schtick (it’s not that bad in my limited experience with them—here in Athens, GA they poke fun at themselves over it, so they don’t take themselves too seriously, which is actually pretty huge). My wife’s Episcopalian church is more or less okay with me (and of course atheism in general), and I have a few good friends from that community (I haven’t actually caught a service in at least 5-6 years now though).

Do we really need to find a specifically atheist community though? Won’t some other secular outfit work, or even a less mumbo-jumbo/dogma-based religious community? Are healthy communities ultimately more about the ideology, or the people?

 Signature 

“Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment.  Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”—Albert Einstein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2011 08:25 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Jr. Member
RankRank
Total Posts:  52
Joined  2011-08-06

.

[ Edited: 31 January 2012 06:30 PM by ... ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2011 10:42 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  129
Joined  2010-12-09
Avokat - 11 June 2011 07:03 PM

I joined this forum to ask one question that I haven’t seen yet, but let me know if this should be under another thread…

When I was a kid I went to church in a California mission.  The mass was unbearably boring, but I have very vivid and fond memories of certain rituals, particularly that everyone would wish “peace be with you” to total strangers on a weekly basis.  After church everyone would gather in the foyer to eat donuts and talk with their neighbors.

For whatever reason I have never able to make myself believe religious myths, though I’ve certainly tried.  Finally I resolved to appreciate science and its beauty, but now that I’m an adult I miss that group exclusivity and connection with a “private club” of kind-hearted and like minded people.  I’ve moved to several cities in the US and abroad now and always felt a certain jealousy of the religious people I met who were instantly plugged into a close community.

In a Real Time with Bill Maher show some time ago, when Bill told a guest (Patton Oswalt maybe?) that he should be an atheist, the guest said “Why? What have you got over there?”  I couldn’t agree more, and I feel like we are not offering those who are in religious communities with an attractive alternative community, one that could actually have a voice in American politics.  I live in San Francisco and and the groups available seem to be interested only in talking about why one SHOULDN’T believe myths.  I feel that I’m well beyond that - where are the groups for those of us who don’t believe, are done analyzing their faith, who don’t have any interest in pursuing the nature of belief or the truth of deism anymore, and yet enjoy the beauty of ritual and the warmth of a local community of similar-thinking people?

So my question is: would Project Reason or its members be interested in creating a club or civic society that is based on humanist values and the promotion of science, instead of a religious organization?  The Freemasons seem to have done an incredible job of promoting rational values through the use of symbols and studies, and are certainly cliquish enough, but require belief in a god to join.

Looking forward to your replies!


I suggest you join a bowling league.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2011 10:44 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  129
Joined  2010-12-09
Leela - 16 August 2011 10:42 AM
Avokat - 11 June 2011 07:03 PM

I joined this forum to ask one question that I haven’t seen yet, but let me know if this should be under another thread…

When I was a kid I went to church in a California mission.  The mass was unbearably boring, but I have very vivid and fond memories of certain rituals, particularly that everyone would wish “peace be with you” to total strangers on a weekly basis.  After church everyone would gather in the foyer to eat donuts and talk with their neighbors.

For whatever reason I have never able to make myself believe religious myths, though I’ve certainly tried.  Finally I resolved to appreciate science and its beauty, but now that I’m an adult I miss that group exclusivity and connection with a “private club” of kind-hearted and like minded people.  I’ve moved to several cities in the US and abroad now and always felt a certain jealousy of the religious people I met who were instantly plugged into a close community.

In a Real Time with Bill Maher show some time ago, when Bill told a guest (Patton Oswalt maybe?) that he should be an atheist, the guest said “Why? What have you got over there?”  I couldn’t agree more, and I feel like we are not offering those who are in religious communities with an attractive alternative community, one that could actually have a voice in American politics.  I live in San Francisco and and the groups available seem to be interested only in talking about why one SHOULDN’T believe myths.  I feel that I’m well beyond that - where are the groups for those of us who don’t believe, are done analyzing their faith, who don’t have any interest in pursuing the nature of belief or the truth of deism anymore, and yet enjoy the beauty of ritual and the warmth of a local community of similar-thinking people?

So my question is: would Project Reason or its members be interested in creating a club or civic society that is based on humanist values and the promotion of science, instead of a religious organization?  The Freemasons seem to have done an incredible job of promoting rational values through the use of symbols and studies, and are certainly cliquish enough, but require belief in a god to join.

Looking forward to your replies!


I suggest you join a bowling league.


If you are looking for something charitable you could try…

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

International Red Cross/Red Crescent

ACLU

UNICEF

Doctors Without Borders

Amnesty International

Oxfam International

The Nature Conservancy

United Way

The Mayo Clinic

Goodwill Inductries

Easter Seals

American Cancer Society

The March of Dimes

American Heart Association

Environmental Defense Fund

Make-A-Wish Foundation

Susan G. Komen for the Cure

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 3
1