Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

 
   
1 of 44
1
Proposal to ban Foul language at this forum
Posted: 05 December 2010 06:48 PM   [ Ignore ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  716
Joined  2009-08-25

I propose that we prohibit foul language from being used at the project reason forum.

Before I develop this idea. I acknowledge to all of you that I am no more knowledgeable than any of you.  I do not want to play the role of the “dad” (I do that too much in real life).  But no one else appears to be bringing up these points.

The definition of foul language for the sake of this discussion, is language in which words such as fuck, shit, mother fucker, asshole, cock (in this case context specific), etc., are being used.

The reasons for this proposal are as follows.

How we speak (or in this case write) is a reflection of our degree of rationality.  I will annoyingly repeat that project reasons mission is to spread scientific knowledge and secular values in society…,... and encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry…
We do not promote critical evaluation of ideas different from our own when our commentary toward our antagonists degrades into insulting rhetoric. Admittedly insulting rhetoric is not mutually exclusive of foul language, but excluding the latter would be a step in improving how we debate irrational beings.

I believe our comments will carry more weight if we utilize civil dialogue.  If you didn’t know us, reading the threads without knowing our backgrounds makes us appear as raving lunatics, no better than the theists that invade our site and attempt to present their points of view.

This is a sample of what doesn’t belong in our forum:

“People of America, Christianity is full of shit and we, as Americans, should stop sticking our noses up Jebus’s ass and claiming it smells like roses.  Christianity sucks, get it?  You are all a bunch of fuckwitted sheeple….stupid, pathetic and vicious, You are a giant slimy stain upon our once green earth, which is now facing extinction because religious sluts like you vote Republican.  You claim you love God and God loves you.  BULLSHIT!  There’s NOTHING, get it?  Take off your diapers and stop sucking the Virgin Mary’s tits (which dion’t amount to much, anyway, heh heh heh) and think like I do!  Atheists are far superior to God’s retarded dick-lickers and our doctrines will make the world a better place, despite the fuckwitted fuckwitted fuckwitted protests of those who claim to love that mentally unbalanced Jew, who was full of shit and had delusions of grandeur.  You know what I say?  Fuck Jebbus!  Have the courage to stick that crucifix right up that bastard’s ass and say,  NO!” . BUrn your Bible, join us and be FREE! “

At the thread that this post appeared, some members of our forum pointed out this is not how most of us would talk, some members however were more accepting and even praised it.  I was surprised by who posted it.  It didn’t expect that person to speak (post) that way.  The comment is a bit dramatic by anybody’s standards, but there nothing in it that couldn’t be said free of the foul language.  The reason why it was posted could be the topic of another thread (and if that person wants to discuss it, I hope that person would do it in a different thread and not hijack this one).

The ideas presented here in this thread were triggered by my sojourn into the Ann coulter forum.  As per the administrators at that site “Ann does not tolerate foul language”... and Nor should we at our forum.
It is ironic that the Ann Coulter forum which posts all manner of noxious ideas is closed.  In other words you have to join it to see what’s being said.  In fact you have to join it with a traceable service provider… (i.e. not gmail but a comcast email address).  It is ironic, and an interesting lesson, that by couching bigotry in banal language, the ideas that it promotes seem ( I can’t think of the right word so I’ll use this one), TRUER.

We, on the other hand, are an open forum.  Anybody can see what we say in our posts without joining, or for that matter without leaving any evidence that they visited us.  Although one must join to participate, that paragraph that I used as an example can be read by someone as morally challenged as the Pope to someone who we would like to positively influence, such as a 14 year old student. I suggest that our ideas, our thoughts, and our way of thinking will be better expressed without the use of profane language.

The best discourse on this site has been in posts that speak in jargon free, non judgmental, easily readable tone.  The posters that speak that way are posters that I (and I’m sure other readers) want to emulate.  The foul language, which often creeps in as discussions become more heated, takes away from the point that is being made. Not only that but it makes the one using that language look as crazy as the person that he’s arguing with.

Since we are promoting critical thinking, shouldn’t we recommend this site to our children and grandchildren of high school age or above.  For those of you out their reading my thread could you seriously recommend our forum to the principal of our high school with the types of posts that I used as an example?

I realize that the idea to ban profane language from this site has been bought up before, with little success.  But I thought I would give it another try.


Jeff

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:02 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6671
Joined  2007-03-11

An occasional four-letter word can be illuminating. Long strings of obscenities are probably not enlightening, but that’s a judgment call. I’m putting my trust in Wyatt Nhoj and Doc Andrew - they’ve got the big guns and they know when to use ‘em.

 Signature 

Luke 6:37 “Judge not, and you shall not be judged. Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. - Some guy named Jesus

Ecurb Noselrub - 11th Century Tejas monk

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  716
Joined  2009-08-25
Ecurb Noselrub - 05 December 2010 07:02 PM

An occasional four-letter word can be illuminating. Long strings of obscenities are probably not enlightening, but that’s a judgment call. I’m putting my trust in Wyatt Nhoj and Doc Andrew - they’ve got the big guns and they know when to use ‘em.

The same degree of illumination can occur without the use of profane language.  and what about kids.  wouldn’t you want them to see some of the dialogues at our site?  Wouldn’t having an open site that was kid friendly help promote our ideas?

Jeff

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:19 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5594
Joined  2004-12-24

I propose that we refrain from choosing to be offended by arbitrarily selected terms.

 Signature 

“Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment.  Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”—Albert Einstein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:19 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6671
Joined  2007-03-11
jdrnd - 05 December 2010 07:11 PM
Ecurb Noselrub - 05 December 2010 07:02 PM

An occasional four-letter word can be illuminating. Long strings of obscenities are probably not enlightening, but that’s a judgment call. I’m putting my trust in Wyatt Nhoj and Doc Andrew - they’ve got the big guns and they know when to use ‘em.

The same degree of illumination can occur without the use of profane language.  and what about kids.  wouldn’t you want them to see some of the dialogues at our site?  Wouldn’t having an open site that was kid friendly help promote our ideas?

If any kids come to this site, their parents should be reported to CPS.

 Signature 

Luke 6:37 “Judge not, and you shall not be judged. Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. - Some guy named Jesus

Ecurb Noselrub - 11th Century Tejas monk

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  716
Joined  2009-08-25
SkepticX - 05 December 2010 07:19 PM

I propose that we refrain from choosing to be offended by arbitrarily selected terms.

In some ways its not about us.


jeff

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6671
Joined  2007-03-11

Speaking of foul language, I offer the following:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FctEF2z5opk

 Signature 

Luke 6:37 “Judge not, and you shall not be judged. Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. - Some guy named Jesus

Ecurb Noselrub - 11th Century Tejas monk

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:39 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  716
Joined  2009-08-25
Ecurb Noselrub - 05 December 2010 07:29 PM

Speaking of foul language, I offer the following:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FctEF2z5opk

That would be an acceptable example of trying to belittle my points without using profane language… Of course it doesn’t make for riveting debate but its better than a string of “expletive deleteds”..... (and it was mildly amusing)

Jeff

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:39 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7911
Joined  2008-02-15

First, the rant you highlighted was a hypothetical atheist rant to make a point. Second, fuck being word Nazis. Third, who the fuck cares what they do at the Ann Fucking Ignorant Bitch Coulter site.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
The Way of the Mister, Vol. 1: Reparative Therapy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:49 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  716
Joined  2009-08-25
GAD - 05 December 2010 07:39 PM

First, the rant you highlighted was a hypothetical atheist rant to make a point. Second, fuck being word Nazis. Third, who the fuck cares what they do at the Ann Fucking Ignorant Bitch Coulter site.


Whether it was a hypothetical atheist rant, a real atheists rant, a theist playing the role of an atheists, it still contains unpleasant language. 

secondly a better way of saying your second point would have been “septic worm infested vole” word Nazi (i guess thats a bit cumbersome but it is more picturesque).  But you didn’t have to use a four letter word to put me down for bringing up the issue of foul language. 

and lastly we do care what coulter does at her site if her means of spreading her ideas are more successful than ours.


Jeff

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 07:50 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1482
Joined  2005-02-22

Well, Jeff… I think if you were to pitch an atheist web site for kids you’d have a lot more to worry about than foul language.

It hard to maintain that words don’t have magical powers if certain magic words must be deleted. Personally, I’d like to see them used more deftly and less of as a crutch when the wit well is dry.

On the whole, the patrons like it this way…. Right? It sure seems like it.

Bottom line, with only the power to delete, how much policing is even possible? There is a line, I know it when I see it, and I delete it. It’s rare, aside from Bobo.

 Signature 

Delude responsibly.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 08:06 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  716
Joined  2009-08-25
Nhoj Morley - 05 December 2010 07:50 PM

Well, Jeff… I think if you were to pitch an atheist web site for kids you’d have a lot more to worry about than foul language.

It hard to maintain that words don’t have magical powers if certain magic words must be deleted. Personally, I’d like to see them used more deftly and less of as a crutch when the wit well is dry.

On the whole, the patrons like it this way…. Right? It sure seems like it.

Bottom line, with only the power to delete, how much policing is even possible? There is a line, I know it when I see it, and I delete it. It’s rare, aside from Bobo.


actually we are a humanist site… is that not correct.  We base our life on empirical information and observation… Isn’t the point of the reason project and its forum to promote that way of life?

and prohibiting foul language is not reinventing the wheel.  Why don’t you join coulters site (as i did) and see how they do it. 


This particular sub forum… “ideas for projects” is loaded with a myraid of suggestions that are certainly interesting but for the most part next to impossible to carry out.  Banning profane language from our site is actually doable.  I listed some of the benefits in the opening comment of doing just that.


I am comfortable at this site.  if the purpose of the forum is solely for people like me GAD, Teuchter, skepticX, (to name a few) to interact, than fine, leave it as is.  But if the purpose of this forum is to promote our ideas, than in order to get a wider audience, one would need to ban a few words.  I didn’t say anything about banning the mobbing that occurs (I get embarassed when that happens), or the heated insulting discussions ( I also sometimes get embarrassed), but just prohibit the use of the foul stuff.  I gave an example of non profane insults about 2 replies ago, when I answered GAD.  I didn’t say no insults just no profane talk.


Jeff

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 08:08 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5594
Joined  2004-12-24
jdrnd - 05 December 2010 07:49 PM

Whether it was a hypothetical atheist rant, a real atheists rant, a theist playing the role of an atheists, it still contains unpleasant language.

It’s only unpleasant language if you decide it is, and you don’t get to make that choice for me, or for anyone else. You’ve chosen to own that aspect of society’s indoctrination, I’ve chosen to reject it because it’s irrational to make reality less pleasant to go along with the herd.

 

jdrnd - 05 December 2010 07:49 PM

secondly a better way of saying your second point would have been “septic worm infested vole” word Nazi (i guess thats a bit cumbersome but it is more picturesque).

It’s a tortured way to get around an artificially self-imposed frailty.

 

jdrnd - 05 December 2010 07:49 PM

But you didn’t have to use a four letter word to put me down for bringing up the issue of foul language.

It made the point more effectively ... at least for those who haven’t decided to allow certain arbitrary terms to dramatically limit their thinking and linguistic perception.

 

jdrnd - 05 December 2010 07:49 PM

and lastly we do care what coulter does at her site if her means of spreading her ideas are more successful than ours.

I think not. Look at the trends in the more recent Pew Forum surveys.

 Signature 

“Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment.  Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”—Albert Einstein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 08:10 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  716
Joined  2009-08-25
SkepticX - 05 December 2010 08:08 PM
jdrnd - 05 December 2010 07:49 PM

Whether it was a hypothetical atheist rant, a real atheists rant, a theist playing the role of an atheists, it still contains unpleasant language.

It’s only unpleasant language if you decide it is, and you don’t get to make that choice for me, or for anyone else. You’ve chosen to own that aspect of society’s indoctrination, I’ve chosen to reject it because it’s irrational to make reality less pleasant to go along with the herd.

 

jdrnd - 05 December 2010 07:49 PM

secondly a better way of saying your second point would have been “septic worm infested vole” word Nazi (i guess thats a bit cumbersome but it is more picturesque).

It’s a tortured way to get around an artificially self-imposed frailty.

 

jdrnd - 05 December 2010 07:49 PM

But you didn’t have to use a four letter word to put me down for bringing up the issue of foul language.

It made the point more effectively ... at least for those who haven’t decided to allow certain arbitrary terms to dramatically limit their thinking and linguistic perception.

 

jdrnd - 05 December 2010 07:49 PM

and lastly we do care what coulter does at her site if her means of spreading her ideas are more successful than ours.

I think not. Look at the trends in the more recent Pew Forum surveys.


Sorry I quoted and then hit the post button.


for your first point…its not about me
for your second point okay maybe the vole insult was a little cumbersome… the art of making up insults has been lost for years , its hardfor me to resurrect it in five minutes.

arbitray terms or not the use of words like fuck, motherfucker, cock sucker, shit, etc are not needed in making ones point… I suggest that they usually detract from the point being made.  since they are considered “BAD” words in some circles and since we are trying to increase our influence, I don’t see the harm it would do to prohibit their use at our site.


jeff

[ Edited: 05 December 2010 08:16 PM by jdrnd ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 08:18 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1482
Joined  2005-02-22

  Mr. Rnd:
actually we are a humanist site… is that not correct.  We base our life on empirical information and observation… Isn’t the point of the reason project and its forum to promote that way of life?

If someone from Project Reason ever showed up, they could promote whatever they want. They don’t, and here we are.

I get behind in my mod duties already. Though it might be fun to re-write everyone’s post with non-offensive offensiveness.

If you write a piece so compelling that everyone was convinced to stop using profanity except in emergencies, that would be impressive. Make it sound reasonable to do so.

 Signature 

Delude responsibly.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 December 2010 08:21 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  716
Joined  2009-08-25
SkepticX - 05 December 2010 08:08 PM

I think not. Look at the trends in the more recent Pew Forum surveys.


There are more people than i would like that beleive what she beleives.  I joined her site to see what is being said.  its frightening.  We should care what is going on at her forum since those people vote and their vote can affect us.  That site is effective.  You can learn from your opponents.  We shouldn’t live with our heads in the ground.

Jeff

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 44
1