Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

 
   
2 of 17
2
Your Inherent Mind is Buddha
Posted: 30 May 2010 12:41 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1883
Joined  2006-02-20
J Kapp - 30 May 2010 12:29 PM
GAD - 30 May 2010 12:26 PM

Thus spoke (in the voice of Tony Robbins) the Woo….

No. You’re Woo!

Anything that refuses to chase a Frisbee is woo.

 Signature 

“All is all there is, you surely wouldn’t ask for more.”  -  Bill Thomas

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 May 2010 08:33 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1264
Joined  2009-10-19
GAD - 30 May 2010 12:40 PM
J Kapp - 30 May 2010 12:29 PM
GAD - 30 May 2010 12:26 PM

Thus spoke (in the voice of Tony Robbins) the Woo….

No. You’re Woo!

Is that a tenet of Buddhism…..

GAD, many aspects of Buddhism you would be able to relate to in a positive manner.  I think you should show some leniency towards Buddhism and accept that it isn’t a run-of-the-mill religion full of “woo.”  Would you like me to present some discourses and parables within the Buddhist canon to prove my point?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 04:55 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4249
Joined  2010-01-29

ECurb: What kills me is that unsmoked gets a pass on this “bright moon in the sky” crap, and I get a loud chorus of WOOOO when I suggest that the universe is a thought. Unsmoked is more wrapped up in Woo than anyone here, but he gets pats on the back because he’s not a theist. “The inherent mind is Buddha.”  There is definitely a double standard around here.

I agree with Bruce on this one.  His “Universe is a thought” was ridiculed by everyone who CHOSE to interpret the comment literally.  (Atheist fundies tend to do that)  They also tend to be much gentler with Buddhism.

JKapp: GAD, many aspects of Buddhism you would be able to relate to in a positive manner.  I think you should show some leniency towards Buddhism and accept that it isn’t a run-of-the-mill religion full of “woo.”  Would you like me to present some discourses and parables within the Buddhist canon to prove my point?

GAD, many aspects of Christianity you would be able to relate to in a positive manner.  I think you should show some leniency towards Christianity and accept that it isn’t a run-of-the-mill religion full of “woo.”  Would you like me to present some discourses and parables within the Christian canon to prove my point?

Unsmoked: I can imagine that this is gobbledygook to most Christians; maybe to most Westerners.  Did Jesus say anything like this?

As a matter of fact, he did, if you read the Gnostic Gospels…..(ECurb may not like this.  Traditional Christians disapprove of the Gnostic Gospels However,.  I will let him provide quotes from the NT, for I am sure there are many…..)

Jesus said to them, (Gospel of Thomas) “When you make the two into one, and when you make the inner like the outer and the outer like the inner, and the upper like the lower, and when you make male and female into a single one, so that the male will not be male nor the female be female, when you make eyes in place of an eye, a hand in place of a hand, a foot in place of a foot, an image in place of an image, then you will enter [the kingdom].” Verse 22.

The disciples said to Jesus, “Tell us, how will our end come?” Jesus said, “Have you found the beginning, then, that you are looking for the end? You see, the end will be where the beginning is. Congratulations to the one who stands at the beginning: that one will know the end and will not taste death.”

His disciples said to him, “When will the kingdom come?” Jesus said, “It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be a matter of saying ‘here it is’ or ‘there it is.’ Rather, the kingdom of the father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it.”

Jesus said, “If they say to you, `Where have you come from?’ say to them, `We have come from the light, from the place where the light came into being by itself, established itself, and appeared in their image.’ If they say to you, `Is it you?’ say, `We are its children, and we are the chosen of the living father.’ If they ask you, `What is the evidence of your father in you?’ say to them, `It is motion and rest.’”

The partially recovered Gospel of Mary begins in the third chapter:

“Will matter then be destroyed or not?”
Jesus then said, “All nature, all formations, all creatures exist in and with one another, and they will be resolved again into their own roots. For the nature of matter is resolved into the roots of its own nature.”

Another gnostic teacher, Monoimus, says:

Abandon the search for God and the creation and other matters of a similar sort. Look for him by taking yourself as the starting point. Learn who it is within you who makes everything his own and says, “My God, my mind, my thought, my soul, my body.” Learn the sources of sorrow:, joy, love, hate ... If you carefully investigate these matters you will find him in yourself.

 Signature 

Whistle while you work.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 06:58 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7911
Joined  2008-02-15
saralynn - 04 June 2010 04:55 AM

JKapp: GAD, many aspects of Buddhism you would be able to relate to in a positive manner.  I think you should show some leniency towards Buddhism and accept that it isn’t a run-of-the-mill religion full of “woo.”  Would you like me to present some discourses and parables within the Buddhist canon to prove my point?

GAD, many aspects of Christianity you would be able to relate to in a positive manner.  I think you should show some leniency towards Christianity and accept that it isn’t a run-of-the-mill religion full of “woo.”  Would you like me to present some discourses and parables within the Christian canon to prove my point?

Exactly! Buddhism is just another steaming pile of woo that I don’t want stuck to my shoe. To paraphrase JKapp from another thread, Buddhism is a don’t care for me as it doesn’t effect the way I live my life. Unfortunately christian (except Bruce’s) and Islam woo does and must be beat down until it is a don’t care (like Bruce’s version).

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
The Way of the Mister, Vol. 1: Reparative Therapy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 07:08 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 20 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5594
Joined  2004-12-24
J Kapp - 30 May 2010 08:33 PM

GAD, many aspects of Buddhism you would be able to relate to in a positive manner.

True.

 

J Kapp - 30 May 2010 08:33 PM

I think you should show some leniency towards Buddhism and accept that it isn’t a run-of-the-mill religion full of “woo.”

Much of it is precisely that—run of the mill woo. It’s just from another culture so isn’t quite the same as the woo we’re used to seeing here. I can translate religious woo that bears translation, personally (and I expect the “other culture” aspect helps some woo get by me because it mistranslates well into Westernized thinking), but GAD has very little if any tolerance for woo. That’s not a flaw, it’s a high standard. Buddhism has enough woo for GAD to be perfectly justified in rejecting it. The stuff in Buddhism that translates into non-woo (or just isn’t woo) all has a non-religious expression, and GAD may or may not be open to it in its secularized format. That’s a different matter, though, than rejecting that within which there be woo.

 Signature 

“Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment.  Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”—Albert Einstein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 07:15 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 21 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4249
Joined  2010-01-29

GAD: Unfortunately christian (except Bruce’s) and Islam woo does and must be beat down until it is a don’t care (like Bruce’s version).

I think Bruce will take issue with this.  I think he cares very much.  But, you and I are guessing because we don’t know how he leads his private life.

On the other hand, my Christian beliefs are of the “beaten down” variety.  However, as vague as they are, I try to be faithful to them.

 Signature 

Whistle while you work.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 07:20 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 22 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4249
Joined  2010-01-29

Hey, GAD and ScepticX, maybe the “woo” is so profound that it is beyond your comprehension. 

How do you know that the recipient…not the message…is at flawed?

 Signature 

Whistle while you work.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 07:22 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 23 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4249
Joined  2010-01-29

Oops “at flawed” is a flaw.  I was going to write “at fault”, but that implied blame, so I changed it to “flawed”.

 Signature 

Whistle while you work.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 07:27 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 24 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7911
Joined  2008-02-15
saralynn - 04 June 2010 07:15 AM

GAD: Unfortunately christian (except Bruce’s) and Islam woo does and must be beat down until it is a don’t care (like Bruce’s version).

I think Bruce will take issue with this.  I think he cares very much.  But, you and I are guessing because we don’t know how he leads his private life.

On the other hand, my Christian beliefs are of the “beaten down” variety.  However, as vague as they are, I try to be faithful to them.

I think you misunderstand, I like Bruce’s woo. If all Christians followed Bruce’s version of Christianity then Christianity would be a don’t care for me.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
The Way of the Mister, Vol. 1: Reparative Therapy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 07:34 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 25 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5594
Joined  2004-12-24
saralynn - 04 June 2010 07:20 AM

Hey, GAD and ScepticX, maybe the “woo” is so profound that it is beyond your comprehension. 

How do you know that the recipient…not the message…is at flawed?


Maybe it’s not, and how would you make such a determination?

I’d use evidence and critical reasoning under the proper conditions (applied science, more or less) and remain open to all viable possibilities according to those standards (not just the ones that don’t suggest it’s woo, nor just the ones that do[/url]), or at least I would make a concerted, genuine effort to do so as equitably as possible.

You?

[ Edited: 04 June 2010 08:05 AM by SkepticX ]
 Signature 

“Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment.  Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”—Albert Einstein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 07:56 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 26 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7911
Joined  2008-02-15
SkepticX - 04 June 2010 07:08 AM
J Kapp - 30 May 2010 08:33 PM

GAD, many aspects of Buddhism you would be able to relate to in a positive manner.

True.

 

J Kapp - 30 May 2010 08:33 PM

I think you should show some leniency towards Buddhism and accept that it isn’t a run-of-the-mill religion full of “woo.”

Much of it is precisely that—run of the mill woo. It’s just from another culture so isn’t quite the same as the woo we’re used to seeing here. I can translate religious woo that bears translation, personally (and I expect the “other culture” aspect helps some woo get by me because it mistranslates well into Westernized thinking), but GAD has very little if any tolerance for woo. That’s not a flaw, it’s a high standard. Buddhism has enough woo for GAD to be perfectly justified in rejecting it. The stuff in Buddhism that translates into non-woo (or just isn’t woo) all has a non-religious expression, and GAD may or may not be open to it in its secularized format. That’s a different matter, though, than rejecting that within which there be woo.

I think a good example that has been on other threads recently is the Golden Rule. It seems that all schools of woo want to attribute it to their woo master. My view is that mutual reciprocity and reciprocal altruism as hugely beneficial to human affairs is completely self-evident and trying to sell me on the greatness of Confucius, Jesus, Buddha etc because they stated the obvious is just woo.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
The Way of the Mister, Vol. 1: Reparative Therapy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 08:23 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 27 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5594
Joined  2004-12-24
GAD - 04 June 2010 07:56 AM

I think a good example that has been on other threads recently is the Golden Rule. It seems that all schools of woo want to attribute it to their woo master. My view is that mutual reciprocity and reciprocal altruism as hugely beneficial to human affairs is completely self-evident and trying to sell me on the greatness of Confucius, Jesus, Buddha etc because they stated the obvious is just woo.


Actually I’d argue that the passive Confucian “Golden Rule” is far superior to the Western version. It says, basically, Do not do unto other as you would not have done to you. So it doesn’t provide any excuse for the Do unto others what you think is best for them because it’s what you would have them do unto you (i.e. impose your ideology upon everyone). interpretation.
But, here’s another indication of what I’m talking about (note where Grayling talks about original Buddhism vs. the Tibetan version).

 Signature 

“Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment.  Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”—Albert Einstein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 08:32 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 28 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7911
Joined  2008-02-15
SkepticX - 04 June 2010 08:23 AM
GAD - 04 June 2010 07:56 AM

I think a good example that has been on other threads recently is the Golden Rule. It seems that all schools of woo want to attribute it to their woo master. My view is that mutual reciprocity and reciprocal altruism as hugely beneficial to human affairs is completely self-evident and trying to sell me on the greatness of Confucius, Jesus, Buddha etc because they stated the obvious is just woo.


Actually I’d argue that the passive Confucian “Golden Rule” is far superior to the Western version. It says, basically, Do not do unto other as you would not have done to you. So it doesn’t provide any excuse for the Do unto others what you think is best for them because it’s what you would have them do unto you (i.e. impose your ideology upon everyone). interpretation.
But, here’s another indication of what I’m talking about (note where Grayling talks about original Buddhism vs. the Tibetan version).

Sorry, but arguing over who said it best is just woo semantics in my view. Remove the woo wrapper and throw it in the trash and what’s left is mutual reciprocity and reciprocal altruism.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
The Way of the Mister, Vol. 1: Reparative Therapy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 09:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 29 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1883
Joined  2006-02-20
saralynn - 04 June 2010 04:55 AM

ECurb: What kills me is that unsmoked gets a pass on this “bright moon in the sky” crap, and I get a loud chorus of WOOOO when I suggest that the universe is a thought. Unsmoked is more wrapped up in Woo than anyone here, but he gets pats on the back because he’s not a theist. “The inherent mind is Buddha.”  There is definitely a double standard around here.

I agree with Bruce on this one.  His “Universe is a thought” was ridiculed by everyone who CHOSE to interpret the comment literally.  (Atheist fundies tend to do that)  They also tend to be much gentler with Buddhism.

I don’t recall saying, “Universe is a thought.”  I said, “The universe is conscious.”

To me this is just a matter of fact statement that doesn’t need belief.  We are aspects of the universe and we are conscious.  The universe has consciousness.  Maybe it’s a form of self-consciousness when we realize that the universe is our larger body.  I can’t see why anyone, atheist or theist would take issue with this, or call it woo.  Isn’t woo an idea that calls for belief?  Is 2 + 2 = 4 woo?  How about a tree?

 Signature 

“All is all there is, you surely wouldn’t ask for more.”  -  Bill Thomas

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2010 09:41 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 30 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7911
Joined  2008-02-15
unsmoked - 04 June 2010 09:29 AM
saralynn - 04 June 2010 04:55 AM

ECurb: What kills me is that unsmoked gets a pass on this “bright moon in the sky” crap, and I get a loud chorus of WOOOO when I suggest that the universe is a thought. Unsmoked is more wrapped up in Woo than anyone here, but he gets pats on the back because he’s not a theist. “The inherent mind is Buddha.”  There is definitely a double standard around here.

I agree with Bruce on this one.  His “Universe is a thought” was ridiculed by everyone who CHOSE to interpret the comment literally.  (Atheist fundies tend to do that)  They also tend to be much gentler with Buddhism.

I don’t recall saying, “Universe is a thought.”  I said, “The universe is conscious.”

To me this is just a matter of fact statement that doesn’t need belief.  We are aspects of the universe and we are conscious.  The universe has consciousness.  Maybe it’s a form of self-consciousness when we realize that the universe is our larger body.  I can’t see why anyone, atheist or theist would take issue with this, or call it woo.  Isn’t woo an idea that calls for belief?  Is 2 + 2 = 4 woo?  How about a tree?

That’s like saying that the algae is the self-consciousness of the rock it is on.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
The Way of the Mister, Vol. 1: Reparative Therapy

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 17
2