Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Archive

The Varieties of Biblical Marriage

by Vorjack
Posted: May 3, 2009.

Print: Unreasonable Faith

We hear a lot about “biblical marriage” these days. Some of us might not be clear on what that means. The website Religious Tolerance has provided a helpful article on the types of marriage found in the pages of the bible.

Here’s a summary:

1.Polygynous Marriage
Probably the most common form of marriage in the bible, it is where a man has more than one wife.

2.Levirate Marriage
When a woman was widowed without a son, it became the responsibility of the brother-in-law or a close male relative to take her in and impregnate her. If the resulting child was a son, he would be considered the heir of her late husband. See Ruth, and the story of Onan (Gen. 38:6-10).

3.A man, a woman and her property — a female slave
The famous “handmaiden” sketch, as preformed by Abraham (Gen. 16:1-6) and Jacob (Gen. 30:4-5).

4.A man, one or more wives, and some concubines
The definition of a concubine varies from culture to culture, but they tended to be live-in mistresses. Concubines were tied to their “husband,” but had a lower status than a wife. Their children were not usually heirs, so they were safe outlets for sex without risking the line of succession. To see how badly a concubine could be treated, see the famous story of the Levite and his concubine (Judges 19:1-30).

5.A male soldier and a female prisoner of war
Women could be taken as booty from a successful campaign and forced to become wives or concubines. Deuteronomy 21:11-14 describes the process.

6.A male rapist and his victim
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 describes how an unmarried woman who had been raped must marry her attacker.

7.A male and female slave
A female slave could be married to a male slave without consent, presumably to produce more slaves.

and of course …

8.Monogamous, heterosexual marriage
What you might think of as the standard form of marriage, provided you think of arranged marriages as the standard. Also remember that inter-faith or cross-ethnic marriage were forbidden for large chunks of biblical history.

The important thing to realize here is that none of these models are described as better than any other. All appear to have been accepted.

So there you go. The next time someone says that we need to stick with biblical marriage in this country, you can ask them which of the eight kinds they would prefer, and why.

Comments (7)

1. Sean Patrick Fannon

Amen! I posted about this and linked here, because this is powerful stuff!

posted on May 20, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

you spelled “polygamous” with an n, and also in the tags you misspelled polygamy.
But otherwise entertaining

posted on May 21, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Hannah—polygyny is a specific kind of polygamy in which there’s one male and several females.  The “gyn” in polygyny is from the same root meaning as the “gyn” in “gynecologist,” a female-stuff-specific doctor.

posted on June 22, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

i sent something similar to this into my local newspaper.  a woman replied saying all multiple wives and such were looked on with disdain by god.  This is so not the case, as one can see by reading the story of king david.  people need to read the bible to see that marriage has changed so much since biblical times

posted on June 24, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Last time I checked we lived in the age of grace and not according to law.  There was a reason these types of marriages were accepted in the OT and not in the NT.  If you’re going to post crap like this, at least do your research.  In addition, let’s go ahead and throw in a little research and historical data of the US and what it was founded on.

posted on June 25, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

So, we live in the age of grace and not according to the law? Sweet—then there’s no Biblical argument against gay marriage! And, some research on what this nation was founded upon:
“I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of…Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all.”—Thomas Paine
“Twenty times in the course of my late reading, have I been upon the point of breaking out, ‘This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!’”—John Adams
“The Christian priesthood, finding the doctrines of Christ levelled to every understanding and too plain to need explanation, saw, in the mysticisms of Plato, materials with which they might build up an artificial system which might, from its indistinctness, admit everlasting controversy, give employment for their order, and introduce it to profit, power, and pre-eminence. The doctrines which flowed from the lips of Jesus himself are within the comprehension of a child; but thousands of volumes have not yet explained the Platonisms engrafted on them: and for this obvious reason that nonsense can never be explained.”—Thomas Jefferson
“Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise.”
“During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution.”—James Madison
“As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the System of Morals and his Religion…has received various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most of the present dissenters in England, some doubts as to his Divinity; tho’ it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an opportunity of knowing the Truth with less trouble.”—Benjamin Franklin
““The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.”—Excerpt from the Treaty of Tripoli (1797), which was unanimously ratified by the Senate.

posted on July 7, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

7. nonsense...

Dear grace,
Scrpiture, which some believe is god breathed, ie “the word of the lord” breaks down to two parts… like you pointed out, the old testament, and the new testament. Jesus of the new testament didn’t come to abolish the old testament. It still counts, read matthew, jesus was a jew that abided by all the jewish laws, mostly.

So you are left with two choices, believe that god inspired the bible, and deal with it when your husband comes home with a lady half your age just for the sake of having someone else to bang. Accept that having non-believers for friends will only bring you down, accept that if you ever have a gay child, you pick your love for god over your love for them without a question, accept that by choosing to be saved, you are choosing to put yourself in a cycle of sin-repentance-forgiveness that repeats over and over and over again, because you are human, thus you are a sinner, and you sin every day. Thats pretty darn depressing if you ask me, good luck ever oh i don’t know being happy or having a clear guilt free head
Or two… take the bible into CONTEXT what was going on in the world when it was written, what did people know in those days. Its a fact that the bible was written by men, civilization was still in its early dark times, the world was a sexist, mystery filled place, and people simply didn’t know any better. The bible tells us that men are sinners, so really you should be questioning the META-NARRIATIVE (big story) that you oh so lovingly cling to. You did not have the luxury of living in those times, poor you, while i’m sure you call your self a christian, the rest of the world calls you ignorant. If you really want to do some good christian radical work, then do what jesus did, fuck off and love everyone.

posted on July 16, 2009
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.