Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Archive

Pale Blue Dot

By Carl Sagan
Posted: April 23, 2012.

Print: Inspired Speeches

In 1990, the Voyager 1 space craft took a photograph of Earth from 6 billion kilometers away. In the photograph, the planet is so small (at 0.12 pixels) it appears as a barely detectable dot.


A few years later, the famous and wonderful astronomer Carl Sagan placed humans within the context of an infinite universe in his book “Pale Blue Dot”, which was inspired by the photograph. His 1996 speech is adapted from this book. Sagan marvels at the smallness of the human stage when seen in relation to the vast cosmos. He points out that all of human history and existence is contained “on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam” and that “there is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world.”


**
Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home. That’s us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every “superstar,” every “supreme leader,” every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there – on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.


The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.


Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.


The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.


It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we’ve ever known.

**

Comments (12)

Beautiful and timeless…

posted on April 23, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Perspective is the fountain of insight.

While the intro to Dr. Sagan’s speech is not wrong, I thought it relevant to point out that this last photograph taken by Voyager 1 was done so at his suggestion and urging.

posted on June 22, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

What a ingenious and brilliant perspective of our trifling presence in the cosmos.  And, yet many think that our presence is the center of everything!  But, once death has found us all; we return to an even smaller mote of dust in the sunbeam.

posted on August 1, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Greatest!

That is our reality and that is it.

posted on August 1, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

5. Wave Rider

“Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from ellewhere to save us from ourselves.”

I agree that mankind is insignificant in context of the universe.  We are living on a pale blue dot in a universe so vast we can’t even truly comprehend it.  It is humbling!

However, I don’t agree that there is not hint of help that will come from somewhere to save us.  The Judeo Christian scriptures/history are replete with divine interventions as well as the promise of a final intervention.  And all knees will someday bow to this great God who is the creator of this vast and incredible universe.  Even those of us who refuse to acknowledge God in this life.  I believe that it is better to bow now than later.

Respectfully,
Wave Rider

posted on August 7, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Wave Rider,

You talk of being humble but then claim that of all the gods of man, all the years of the earth’s existence, of all the geographic locations in the world you just happen to be born at a time and place that worships the true creator, and has the one true magic book to prove it.  You are not humble at all, nor are you correct.

posted on August 8, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

7. Wave Rider

Ryan,
In all due respect, you did not address my statements.  You basically made 2 points.  First you addressed my point by asserting an argument about a “one true magic book.”  The statement lacks scholarship and is merely a smear.  Second you opined concerning my humility.  I am relaying a message from the “magic book” you so disprove of – i.e. he creation declares Gods glory.  I believe it just as firmly as you believe the universe was created out of nothing, from nothing.  I don’t assign arrogance to you for taking that position.  In fact, I would laud that position if it is based on honest study and contemplation.  So why should you determine I am not humble?  That lacks reason.  Unless of course atheists are the only ones, in your book , that can come up with honest assessments of origins and endings.

  Now, I really don’t know if you have read or studied this magic book?  You don’t provide evidence that you have.  And if you have read it the next question is have you studied it?  You have not shownevidence of either.  If you have, please provide better arguments.

On my part, I have studied scripture and I have studied science (to the level I am capable - I am not an Isaac Newton or Steven Hawking).  But I have investigated enough to know there are extreme weaknesses in the argument of complex creation based on merely matter, time and chance.  I have also investigated the message, history, prophecies, etc. (in the context of science as well) of the scripture to know there is a considerable amount of evidence that God spent a great deal of time trying to present His case to man).  In the process I have determined that it is logical to believe the bible when it says the creation reveals God’s glory.  And that at teh end of the day every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.

Regards,
Wave Rider

posted on August 11, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Wave,
Many of us have studied both as well and come to the opposite conclusion.  You apparently need to have this faith and proclaim there is enough evidence to support it when you provide none.  The ‘God did it’ excuse just doesn’t do it for those of us who aren’t under the spell and in the end that’s all you have.  I have no idea how the universe was created and neither do you, but you are the one arrogantly making a claim you can’t back up rationally.  And of course you think your belief is logical, who can come to any other conclusion about one’s own beliefs.

For what it’s worth I’d suggest watching this TV episode in its entirety if you get the chance and serious think for a moment that all of this could simply be in your head.  You form your experience around your worldview and ‘see’ evidence to support it.

http://science.discovery.com/videos/through-the-wormhole-did-we-invent-god/

posted on August 11, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

9. Wave Rider

Patrick,
You obviously have not paid close attention to my previous posts on matters.  I have provided logical arguments for a number of different issues.
As to your assertion that you don’t know how the universe started?  You are not alone.  None of us really know.  We all take it on faith based on the evidence provided.  Your faith is in an extremely complex universe that originated out of nothing.  My faith is in a designer /creator who is greater than the creation.  Evolution which has to suspend the know laws of the universe to spontaneously originate continues to do so as it violates the known laws of the universe (i.e.  the upward progression from simple to complex).  Creation’s ongoing operation, after origins, is supported by the known laws of the universe (i.e. the downward progression from complex to simple). 
As to the evidence on the scripture, there are volumes that can be written as to what God said in scripture and what has followed in fulfillment.  But I will focus on one thing for now – Islam, Israel and the end times. 
In Genesis chapter 16, “the Angel of the Lord” was talking to Hagar, Abraham’s concubine, concerning her son Ishmael.  The Angel told her that Ishmael would be a wild donkey of a man.  Ishmaels hand will be against every man and every man’s hand will be against him.  As you know, the Islamic Arabs claims to be descendents of Ishmael (and the geographic location supports this assertion – the scripture also foretold Ishmael to be a father of princes).  And this assertion has held to be true – centuries later.  (the estimated time of prophecy was 2,000 BCE). 
The bible also foretold the dispersion of Israel to the ends of the earth and the subsequent re-uniting of the Israeli’s in Israel in the end times.  In Deuteronomy 28, we see how it is foretold that Israel will be scattered among all the nations some time after they were initially lead into Canaan but Joshua.  It is also foretold that they will find no rest for the soles of their feet (not accepted in the nations they reside in).  They will be in fear and dread.  This was also foretold by prophets such as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Amos, etc.  that they will be restored to Israel in the end times is also foretold (for example Ezekiel 38:8).
The bible also foretold the current backlash against Israel in that all nations will be aligned against it (even a great war in which those aligned are destroyed).  This alliance is lead by Russia, Iran and many of the Islamic nations.  But the key point is that all nations will be against Israel (see Ezekiel 33 on – written between 575 and 592 BCE).  As we now know, the only nation effectively supporting Israel is the USA and that support is fast failing.  And Russian is actively aligning with middle east nations as she never has before.  Are these the end times as foretold?
This is only one instance.  The history of the scripture is alsoa good one.  The scripture has withstood scrutiny better than any text in the history of mankind (as well as constant efforts to eradicate it).

Regards,
Wave Rider

posted on August 18, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Wave, I assume you are talking about the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics with regards to Evolution.  The only creationists who still use this argument are either wholly ignorant, completely disingenuous or entirely deluded.  I would peg you in the last group as you seem genuine.  Here’s a link that explains why it’s wrong.  When you try to fight science with scientists you will always lose.  Quite honestly you don’t understand the physics behind any of this so it’s easy for some disingenuous creationists to bamboozle you with scientific sounding bullshit and you’ll eat it up.  Hardly any scientists (physicist, biologist, chemists) takes this argument seriously because it’s bullshit.  For what it’s worth, I have an advanced degree in physics and can tell you firsthand it’s bullshit.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/thermo/probability.html

If you had watched the show for the link I provided you would see how it would explain why you see all these connections that support a belief you so desperately need.  Biblical prophecies are only impressive to those who are predisposed to the beliefs to begin with.  The Bible makes lots of predictions that are wrong, but you ignore those and draw huge significance to those that it might have gotten right by chance or creative interpretations.  Do you ever read any critical analyses for your beliefs?  Included is another link to failed prophecies although I’m not sure why I should bother anymore.  If you are delusional, would you even know it?
 
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Failed_biblical_prophecies

posted on August 18, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

11. Wave Rider

Patrick,

I will look at the links.  However, with all due respect you must be aware that every theory must be supported by assumptions that are often based on/biased by that persons world views (as both yours and mine are).  Without these assumptions the theorectical postion taken would no longer be theory but fact.  In the case of origins, NO ONE was present at the time of creation (or in your case the first minute fraction of a second when all this began from nothing, because of nothing, for no purpose at all and in a manner in which current laws of physics do not apply).  So all we can do is observe phenomena that is significanlty removed from the original event and extrapolate back into a time none of us can even begin to understand.  And what are we left with? Theory!  NO ONE has proof either way as to GOD or NO GOD in terms of origins.  EVERY ONE has to believe in GOD or NO GOD utilizing an element of faith.

Having said that, I believe theories are useful.  Some are stronger than others.  I find atheistic theories of origins wanting – more so than theistic creationist or even intelligent design theories.  As to your experts, they are often countered by both.  And quite intelligently I might add.

I believe that I have made the following point with you in the past.  You have no idea as to the sources or depths of my inquiry into this matter.  I am sorry you have to resort to brutish verbal abuse rather than intelligent argument.  All I really get from you is a refence to someones else’s work.  I would like to see you articulate a position on your own. 

Finally, the demeaning tenor of your response will not deter me from continuing in defense of God.  And I do so for your benefit not mine.  As you are aware, I really don’t get much out of these discourses other than abuse which is fine by me as I actually find those responses rather amusing.  I continue because I am compelled to give you a chance to see the beauty of God someday.

Again, I will view your links and respond.  I hope to do so soon but can’t promise.  I travel quite a bit and often don’t get a lot of time to sit down to write.

Hope all goes well with you until I do.

Wave Rider

posted on August 28, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Wave, the point is if you followed the first link is that your brain is wired to see the world through the lens of a Bronze Age mythology.  However, mine is not. 

I doubt either one of us choose our worldview.  It would help for both of us to be more cognizant of that fact.  I try, but it’s difficult when the real world implications of ancient thinking can have such dire real world consequences.  I have no need to believe in a God and am happy enough understanding the world as its revealed through science.  If my replies were demeaning I apologize.

Regards,

Patrick

posted on September 1, 2012
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.