Project Reason is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.

Donate to Project Reason

Join the Mailing List

Sign up to receive email updates from Project Reason.

Log in

 
not a member? Join here.
Forgot your password?

Twitter and Facebook

Follow Project Reason on Twitter

The Scripture Project

Browse the Bible, Qur’an or Book of Mormon for scriptural criticism, insights and careful annotation.

Most Recently Updated Passages

Archive

2010 In Review


Posted: January 1, 2011.

Print: God Discussion

2010 In Review: The Most Outrageous, Ignorant and Positive News Stories and Quotes about Atheists, Humanists and Non-Theists

As an increasing number of people are leaving organized religion, the verbal attacks against atheists, humanists, secularists and other freethinking non-Christians are becoming more virulent.

The growing exodus from organized religion is set on a backdrop of increasing Christian fundamentalism.  Throughout the year, Americans have been hearing the Tea Party’s battle cry of “Christian nationalism.”  Political figures like Sarah Palin have declared that America’s laws are based on the Christian bible.  The Texas State Board of Education made alarming changes to its history books in order to emphasize conservative values and to minimize the role of the Enlightenment in America’s founding.  Social conservatives are still trying to force creationism in schools as a legitimate science, and a whale of an ark is being constructed in Kentucky — with plenty of tax perks.

For non-theists, there’s been good and bad.  We took a look at our news archives and compiled what we consider to be the best and the worst news stories and quotes about the atheist and freethought community reported during the year 2010.

The 5 Most Outrageous, Discriminatory and Ignorant Statements Made About Non-Believers During the Year 2010.

#5: “The message of the Declaration of Independence is under attack from the ACLU and atheists because it refuted the lie about a constitutional mandate for “separation of church and state.” Atheists have filed numerous lawsuits in the courts of activist judges to try to eliminate our right to acknowledge God in public places, in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and in Ten Commandments monuments. The atheists are trying to change American history, expunge all reference to religion from textbooks and make us a completely secular nation. History proves America was founded by religious men who believed that a divine Creator is basic to good government.”

July 2010 – Phillis Schlafly of the Eagle Forum, in explaining to World Net Daily why America’s Declaration of Independence is actually a religious document.

#4: “Atheism is not the result of objective assessment of evidence, but of stubborn disobedience; it does not arise from the careful application of reason but from willful rebellion. Atheism is the suppression of truth by wickedness, the cognitive consequence of immorality.In short, it is sin that is the mother of unbelief.”

March 2010 – James S. Spiegel, author of The Making of An Atheist, to the Christian Post.

#3 “Atheists are parasites in the sense that they are benefiting from everything that religious culture has built in America, but they are doing nothing to add energy into the system.”
September 2010 – Rabbi Lapin, with Glenn Beck on Fox News.

#2 In February 2010, the religious right had an absolute fit because the Obama administration met with representatives of the Secular Coalition of America, who included atheists and humanists.  The Secular Coalition asked the Departments of Justice, Health and Human Services to address (1) neglect and abuse inflicted on children whose parents chose faith healing over medicine, (2) military proselytizing and discrimination against armed services personnel who are not evangelical Christians, and (3) fixing faith-based initiatives so that secular options are equally available to those in need.

The faithful characterized the Secular Coalition as a hate group and Bill Donohue of the Catholic League went as far as to say that President Obama was actively trying to “crush Christianity in America.”   While there were numerous statements indicating that non-religious people were bringing about the downfall of America and that they should not be allowed to have any say in government, the PETITION TO STOP OBAMA’S CAMPAIGN TO DE-CHRISTIANIZE AMERICA drafted by Rick Scarborough and signed by religious right activists at Vision America pretty much said it all:

“Whereas President Barack Obama often goes out of his way to acknowledge Islam, while slighting Christianity

Whereas, for 8 years, President George W. Bush observed National Day of Prayer by addressing a group of religious leaders in the East Room of the White House, like his predecessors going back to John F. Kennedy

Whereas, last year, President Obama had no such a ceremony—a move hailed by a spokesman for the American Atheists

Whereas all President Obama did on National Day of Prayer 2009 was to issue a proclamation, which he sent to Congress late in the day

Whereas, while the White House refuses to participate in religious ceremonies involving Christians, for the first time in our history, atheists recently met with administration officials

Whereas, since assuming office, President Obama has consistently misrepresented this country religious heritage and our commitment to Christianity

Whereas, on his first trip abroad, Obama told the Turkish Parliament: ‘Although we have a large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation…’—but, according to a 2009 survey, 62% of Americans believe America is a Christian nation

Whereas our currency has the motto, ‘In God We Trust,’ which even the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (the most liberal in the land) recently acknowledged to be constitutional

Whereas our National Anthem contains the stirring words, ‘Then conquer we must when our cause it is just. And this be our motto, In God Is Our Trust’

Whereas our nation’s capital has no shortage of monuments to our Judeo-Christian heritage

Whereas the president’s actions noted above appear to be part of a deliberate campaign to de-Christianize America

Therefore, we the undersigned call on Congress to pass a resolution affirming that America is a nation founded on Judeo-Christian ideals and expressing its dismay over the president’s actions which exalt Islam and atheism while slighting Christianity.”

#1 In the first ever official state visit to the UK by the head of the Vatican, Pope Benedict XVI (formerly Joseph Ratzinger) stood alongside the Queen of England, warning about atheist extremism.  In concluding a passage about the Nazis, he proclaimed:

“As we reflect on the sobering lessons of the atheist extremism of the Twentieth Century, let us never forget how the exclusion of God, religion and virtue from public life leads ultimately to a truncated vision of man and of society and thus to a reductive vision of the person and his destiny.”

The 5 Most Positive News Stories and Quotes About Atheists and the Freethought Community During the Year 2010.

#5 In April 2010, the Freedom From Religion Foundation won its constitutional challenge to the National Day of Prayer in a Wisconsin federal court. The case is currently on appeal. Wrote Judge Barbara Crabb:

“The same law that prohibits the government from declaring a National Day of Prayer also prohibits it from declaring a National Day of Blasphemy.”

#4 Another study confirmed that atheists’ morals are not inferior to those of churchgoers:

“It seems that in many cultures religious concepts and beliefs have become the standard way of conceptualising moral intuitions.  [T] his link is not a necessary one, many people have become so accustomed to using it, that criticism targeted at religion is experienced as a fundamental threat to our moral existence.”

February 2010 — Dr. Marc Hauser, Harvard University, co-author of research report showing that atheists are just as ethical as churchgoers.

#3 Science is finding that atheists and liberals tend to have higher IQs than religious people and conservatives.

“So, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to go against their natural evolutionary tendency to believe in God, and they become atheists.”

March 2010 — Satoshi Kanazawa, Evolutionary Psychologist at the London School of Economics and Political Science, as quoted in press release regarding “Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent” published in Social Psychology Quarterly.

#2 A report issued in September 2010 by the Pew Forum revealed that atheists and agnostics know more about religion than religious people.

“‘American atheists and agnostics tend to be people who grew up in a religious tradition and consciously gave it up, often after a great deal of reflection and study,’ said Alan Cooperman, associate director for research at the Pew Forum.

‘These are people who thought a lot about religion,’ he said. ‘They’re not indifferent. They care about it.’

Atheists and agnostics also tend to be relatively well educated, and the survey found, not surprisingly, that the most knowledgeable people were also the best educated. However, it said that atheists and agnostics also outperformed believers who had a similar level of education.”

#1 For the first time in American history, a presidential administration met for a policy briefing with the American nontheist community. The Secular Coalition for America met with members of the Obama administration on February 26.

“The category ‘no religion’ is the fastest growing category in America, and it is high time political leaders begin to take us seriously as a voting group whose approval they should hope to deserve.”

Daniel Dennett, Philosopher and Member of the Secular Coalition of America’s Advisory Board.

Comments (9)

I feel sorry for the way America is crumbling under the pressure of intolerance. The biggest problem as I see it is that both religious fundamentalists and agnostics / non-theists believe that their opposites represent the destruction of the American way of life.

The American way of life, surely, is LIBERTY. As I see it, that has to include the freedom to think as one chooses (which may have unfortunate side-effects, such as the freedom to propagate hate-speech - take note, Fox News).

So, unfortunately for the fundamentalist right, they fail even by their own standards, as they would suppress the freedom to express a non-theist view, even though most such views are offered by reasonable and intelligent people. No freedom of speech = no liberty = no America.

These are the people who would turn the USA into a bizarre mirror of some fundamentalist, repressive middle-eastern state.

BTW, I am a non / anti-religious person who believes in a ‘supreme being’ [after much deep consideration]. I dislike those religious texts though. Christians tell me I damned. Bummer.

posted on January 1, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

2. Sir Crispin IV

“Atheism is not the result of objective assessment of evidence, but of stubborn disobedience; it does not arise from the careful application of reason but from willful rebellion.”  This one always makes me laugh, the irony is priceless.

posted on January 2, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

3. Brian from Texas

For all their Muslim-bashing, the Christian Right certainly believe we should have similar laws as in Iran or Saudi Arabia where Atheists and blasphemers are stoned and beheaded.

posted on January 3, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

It appears that the most important event in political history and this should have been the most positive event for 2010.

Is Australia, there was a federal election.  The person who went on to win the election stated publicly the words that NO politician in America can or would ever dare before during or after an election.  This incredible pre-election words were I AM AN ATHEIST and went on to win the election.  More incredibly the person is a woman.

Just try and imagine that happening in America!

posted on January 5, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

I meant to say “It appears that the most important event in secular political history has been overlooked or unknown to the readers here”

posted on January 5, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

“So, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to go against their natural evolutionary tendency to believe in God, and they become atheists.”

How did that make it on the good news list??

posted on January 10, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

7. Rachel Barringer

Thank you for another insightful article. I’m always surprised to see how the far right can twist a positive step that Obama takes and twist it into something negative. And those people are the ones whom we should be looking up to for our moral compass? I think not! Keep it up, Mr. Harris. You’re doing a fine job delivering us this news.

posted on January 11, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

Marius,

  I sort of agree with you, but I think defining it as liberty misses some of it more blunt, as well as more subtle, aspects.

  I guess firstly we should point out that we tend to reserve liberty for adults and not children, children tend to grow up in the manner adults show them. So there is such a thing as an environment for liberty. It is possible to statistically alter the chances of children having freedom of thought as adults, lay down rail tracks so to speak, even if not true per individual. This is used by ‘regimes’ around the world, and is the explanation for the cultural ‘belief’ differences that the adults in various society will strongly defend - including ideas like liberty and democracy themselves.

That aside, as it is only a minor point, liberty for adults represents equal opportunity for good and bad ideas in the freedom of ones mind. It is not the same as saying the state should not interact with bad ideas - and by extension other people too.

While on a person-person scale the legal freedom to believe anything should only be regulated by personal interactions, at the level of the state other things matter as well.

That is where it is both blunt, and subtle. The state cannot legalise ideas, we have been down that line with blasphemy (indeed, are heading back down it).

If I believe something that is not real though the interaction with the state should be roughly equal to the danger my belief poses to the safety its citizens.

It is subtle, and has value judgement (remember that Christianity used the same excuse - the health of the society over that of the individual, to justify blasphemy punishments), but in instances of AID’s denialism, anti-vaccination, prayer-healing the state has a responsibility to intervene in the negative outcomes of adults beliefs. This could actually be said to be true whether the beliefs are real, or not.

So the defense of liberty is more complicated than just saying adults have the freedom to believe in whatever they want. They do in their own heads (including anti-democratic, or anti-liberty ideas), but reducing enacted belief that results in increased suffering is not contrary to the notion of liberty.

To know the difference though we need to fully understand the positives and negatives of decisions, as well as how beliefs motivate them. The role of free accurate and unbiased education is essential here, even if it seems to impinge on religious freedoms. Teaching children how to conceive of a problem using the set of skills required to solve the problem is essential. That is why systems of philosophy and governance from 2000 years ago can struggle, and why we must interact with them.

Notice though that the calls of the non-theists were for equal opportunities, not reduced opportunities for the religious, even though it is not hard to formulate reasonable arguments of how beliefs such as anti-evolutionary stances and biblical literalism do not provide toolsets for dealing with realworld problems.

This whole relationship is not anti-liberty, even when a school is told to teach evolution and not creationism. Maintaining freedom of adults minds, but good governance of education is what it is about. Then the freedom of adults to debate each other with the hope and trust that adults are still responsible and capable of listening. That is a system of solid liberty.

posted on February 11, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

I must say that overall I am really taken with this site.You obviously know what you are talking about as you write with passion. If only I had your writing ability I have bookmarked your website and look forward to additional updates.
Business Loan

posted on May 10, 2011
report this as inappropriate

You don't have permission to flag this entry.